Third KDE 4 Development Snapshot Released: 'Kludge' (KDE.News)
Third KDE 4 Development Snapshot Released: 'Kludge' (KDE.News)
Posted Feb 24, 2007 22:59 UTC (Sat) by aseigo (guest, #18394)In reply to: Third KDE 4 Development Snapshot Released: 'Kludge' (KDE.News) by jd
Parent article: Third KDE 4 Development Snapshot Released: 'Kludge' (KDE.News)
(i'm in a bit of a philosophical mood right now, beware!)
an interesting cultural thing is happening here:
we're reaching out to new audiences (communities) without leaving behind
the community (audience) we currently are a part of and have. different
audiences have different communications needs, but as we speak to them as
well (as opposed to "instead of our previous audience") the current
audience will sometimes go, "hey! we don't speak that way! are you losing
your religion on us?"
this is something that is rooted deep in the dualism and ownership
concepts deeply embedded in most of our cultures which say "you can only
do one thing; if you do another you can not do that first thing too"
and "one can not have multiple associates". it's easy to see these ideas
embedded throughout our cultures.
since free software is, in part, an ethical-cultural exercise these
prejudices transfer over.
however, they are simply not true.
we are still committed to churning out the usual technological goodies we
do in a community manner with the usual technical discussion/rigor and
levity/fun we tend to engage with. that has not changed, nor will it.
we are also striving to be able to talk to people for whom that mode of
behaviour is completely alien to the point of not being interfacable for
them.
such audiences include people currently mesmerized by the marketing of
microsoft and apple, the technological hipsters of the world, ISVs who are
starting to look afield (thank you microsoft for such a wonderfully poor
showing with vista =), system integrators who are working with free
software but doing so mostly on their own (and often feeling adrift) ...
kde is no longer a small project. if we were a neighbourhood pub at one
point we're now an entire stretch of pubs, clubs, eateries and more.
diversification happens in that process.
however, as someone who is watching this happen in his real-world
neighbourhood right now and therefore realizes how disturbing it is: we
are conscious of the fact that we must not "gentrify" our neighbourhood so
that the cool little pub goes away.
it is, after all, where i and most of our contributors still live. =)
btw, the commit digest, mailing lists, irc channels, etc.. are much
more "down home" if you're looking for that ....
Posted Feb 26, 2007 1:58 UTC (Mon)
by mmarq (guest, #2332)
[Link] (5 responses)
hmmm... i belive i know what you mean, but FOSS is already a "barrier" transcending paradigma, so *can*... The *can not* is only for the psichotic materialistic part of the world.
"" the current
You are absolutely right, never alienate your standing base. Good or bad, talking dirty or reciting erudit poetry, they (those you know) are your best trust, your backup defence.
Jump in the world of commerce and marketing language, from which i desire more each time to get disconnected from, and know that it is, in a philosofical proper sense, only *sophism*. Exercises of style, image, which semantic is the catch of the attention of victms... oops customers... not their comprehension.
But that catch is BASED on the fashions, looks, ways,... that are constantly and *ARTIFICIALY* being delivered and promoted, like in a brain wash operation, upon the world population.
Those promoting it, are from big think-tanks, connected to various extremely influencial interests, commercial, politic... various... (its not a conspiracy, its a method), that neverthless have always big mass-media mediums(brain-wash machine) and money at their disposal.
Everybody else, to have marketing sucess, much intuit what are the next fashions, styles, looks, ways... being artificialy promoted, and capitalize on it.
Making a long story short, talk(whatever) in the way of the big media promoted *style* of the momment, and you may get good press coverage, tell the truth and no one will print a line.
Its my belive that Open Source, never needed that, quite the opposite... i still have in my power 1997 IT magazines where, those Linux guys, where treated like unreliables fanatics not deserving trust...
But the irony of it, is that Open Source is already bitting the but, of the always promoted, Big Miss Universe of the IT (MS le Crap), and has turned Unix preception from esoteric to accessible.
Posted Feb 26, 2007 9:07 UTC (Mon)
by aseigo (guest, #18394)
[Link] (4 responses)
i assume you read the -rest- of what i wrote explaining exactly
realize, however, that by asking for some imagined purity what you are
fortunately, it's not an exclusive, binary sort of being. but realize that
free software is for more than just you and me.
and it isn't just sophism. at least not what we're doing. it's explaining
what would be sophism is to try and fool people with half-truths and lies.
we -started- by asking ourselves: what do we want to focus our messaging
we're looking for effective, and even new, ways of communicating our core
and if that offends you, i'll see your claim of "sophism" and raise it
Posted Feb 26, 2007 18:07 UTC (Mon)
by mmarq (guest, #2332)
[Link] (3 responses)
??... i didnt take offense of nothing !
My point is that the *language* inside developments circles, dosent have to adress *sophistic* language requirements of the marketing world:
.- they are more or less orthogonal, meaning that the development should or must or have to have a commercial focus, but no matter what, marketing language will only be at best a generalized approach.
.- inherent openness of FOSS is what make marketing live hard, because they try to pick notions that are terrible at generalization, and often at odds with fashions, styles or ways... being promoted.
.- FOSS thrived so far being at odds with generalized perceived *ways*... so why bother?
All the best.
Posted Feb 26, 2007 18:41 UTC (Mon)
by aseigo (guest, #18394)
[Link] (2 responses)
i would agree in general; so when we do speak with more "market friendly"
the initial reaction to this article is a good example of why.
> inherent openness of FOSS is what make marketing live hard
to me that just means we need to re-shape "marketing" a bit, just as we
> so why bother?
because this has not worked on the desktop side of things, and for pretty
> All the best.
likewise =)
Posted Feb 26, 2007 20:04 UTC (Mon)
by mmarq (guest, #2332)
[Link] (1 responses)
"" ...to me that just means we need to re-shape "marketing" a bit... ...certainly a challenge, but challenges are fun. ""
agreed... but lack of control of the "bigtime promotion of general fashions, styles, looks, ways... " can turn the fun... not so fun. Remenber how recently, MS CEO tryed to connect the general FOSS paradigma with an "IP thieves" lair, in a purely marketing(FUD) manouver.
So a thick skin and caution is also required.
Posted Feb 27, 2007 5:04 UTC (Tue)
by xoddam (guest, #2322)
[Link]
"" "you can onlyThird KDE 4 Development Snapshot Released: 'Kludge' (KDE.News)
do one thing; if you do another you can not do that first thing too"
and "one can not have multiple associates" ""
audience will sometimes go, "hey! we don't speak that way! are you losing
your religion on us?" ""
> never alienate your standing baseThird KDE 4 Development Snapshot Released: 'Kludge' (KDE.News)
this? =) we agree on that point, which is good.
asking is to restrain who we can effectively talk to and what we can
effectively accomplish. if we are only allowed to speak the language of
the free software world we will not reach other areas that we really need
to be.
your taking offense over something that doesn't affect you in the least
will lead only to you having less of what you want in the future.
what we have in terms that are understandable to others. we're throwing
bridges across communication gaps that others (primarily, the proprietary
competition) would sooner see remain.
there are those who do this in the open source world, sadly, but i don't
think we're (KDE) one of those communities.
around? what should everything we talk about resonate on? our answer was:
1) freedom, 2) technological prowess. in that order.
values in ways that will allow them to be heard by more people.
with an "elitist behaviour" right back.
"" but realize thatThird KDE 4 Development Snapshot Released: 'Kludge' (KDE.News)
your taking offense over something that doesn't affect you ""
> they are more or less orthogonalThird KDE 4 Development Snapshot Released: 'Kludge' (KDE.News)
terms at times, we need to find a way to remind the community about the
rest of our communication which is quite dry and straight forward.
have re-shaped development methodologies a bit. certainly a challenge, but
challenges are fun.
obvious reasons. while the server side of the market is indeed populated
primarily by sophisticated, tech-aware people who are used to dealing with
technical terms, complex ideas and community networking on- and off-line,
the desktop market is very, very different.
Completely on agreement.Third KDE 4 Development Snapshot Released: 'Kludge' (KDE.News)
I'm very impressed. It seems mmarq has met his match :-)Wow! aseigo not only deciphers mmarq's posts but responds in kind!