The return of modversions
The return of modversions
Posted Feb 2, 2003 3:50 UTC (Sun) by wolfrider (guest, #3105)Parent article: The return of modversions
>> Among other things, this approach makes it easier to force the loading of a module with mismatched symbols, should anybody be unwise enough to attempt such a thing.
--Is it just me, or does this strike anyone else as a potential problem?
1. Root is the only one that can/should load modules
2. Modules with mismatched symbols act unpedictably(?)
3. This fix sounds like modules will have (at least a temporary) higher memory-usage requirement than 2.4.
--Please feel free to correct / educate me here...
Posted Feb 2, 2003 5:05 UTC (Sun)
by Ross (guest, #4065)
[Link]
Sometimes you know that a version mismatch doesn't matter. Yes, it is rare... it is much more likely that a version mismatch would cause unpredictable problems. But since root is the only one that can do this I don't see any problem. It is nice to get a warning if you do it by accident, but I hate arbitrary restrictions on root.
The return of modversions