Wrong problem, wrong solution
Wrong problem, wrong solution
Posted Oct 26, 2006 7:44 UTC (Thu) by lacostej (guest, #2760)In reply to: GPL-only symbols and ndiswrapper by gmaxwell
Parent article: GPL-only symbols and ndiswrapper
So basically developpers are trying to put a technical restriction to solve a communication problem. That won't work.
If users, why not add a littel daemon that detects ndiswrapper, reports the hardware used, query a DB and report a warning to the user saying that a better driver exists ?
Users don't know about alternatives ? Let them know the alternatives.
Posted Oct 26, 2006 22:32 UTC (Thu)
by k8to (guest, #15413)
[Link]
Such a daemon would really need to be set up by the distribution, who are in a better situation to drive users towards free drivers in the first place, by autoinstalling them. Such a further steps seems a nuisance to me.
"I just installed NDISwrapper after repeated crashes from the free driver, and this stupid popup is complaining that I should go back, what a joke!"
Maybe that wouldn't happen, but I do not like this style of solution.
The kernel developers are -- via technical means -- conveying to kernel-driver developers what they believe is a fair manner of use of their code by proprietary modules. This is completely reasonable. The debate is in the details of how they go about it.
You presume a single agent where there are many. Wrong problem, wrong solution
