Some perspective for the timeline..
Some perspective for the timeline..
Posted Oct 17, 2006 8:12 UTC (Tue) by nim-nim (subscriber, #34454)In reply to: Some perspective for the timeline.. by nhippi
Parent article: Local root exploit in NVidia driver
>> The shoker is the length of time it's taken for this problem to be realy
>> made public. The issue has been around since 2004 and it wasn't until July
>> 2006 until a nvidia developer in their forums acknowledged it was a problem
>> and gave it a bug report number.
> I hate binary drivers as much as the next guy, but you are not being fair
> here.
> The 2004 report was on xorg bugzilla, but it wasn't reported against nvidia
> drivers, instead against org/Server/General.
And remind us again why nvidia was not reading xorg bugzilla in 2004?
... right, out-of-tree binary drivers and development team dissociated from the FOSS community
Posted Oct 26, 2006 13:46 UTC (Thu)
by jond (subscriber, #37669)
[Link]
The distributions only switched to X.org from XFree86 in mid-2004 (Debian's first release with X.org instead of XFree86 is due /this/ december). It is hardly suprising that Nvidia wasn't reading every bug in the X.org bugzilla before the dust had settled.Some perspective for the timeline..
