|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Posted Sep 27, 2006 17:34 UTC (Wed) by clugstj (subscriber, #4020)
Parent article: Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

It seems obvious to me that they filed the court papers for the express purpose of giving clout to the takedown letters they are sending to sites hosting the tool. My prediction: they will never prove the "stolen" part of this.


to post comments

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Posted Sep 27, 2006 18:52 UTC (Wed) by mikov (guest, #33179) [Link] (8 responses)

It doesn't matter if they can prove it. In a lawsuit it will cost each side hundreds of thousands of dollars to even get to the point where any proving actually has to occur. In the end, even if Microsoft can't prove anything, they only lose their own expenses (which they can more than afford).

In an astouding number of cases the US justice system literally translates to "money=justice". In practice, if you cannot afford the outrageous expenses (think at least several hundreds of dollars per hour!!), it turns out that you are guilty until proven innocent. It can be shocking to realize that it really is like that - not an exaggeration.

No sane individual or small company can gight against that and survive (unless EFF picks up the tab?). So, it is an excellent business strategy for Microsoft.

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Posted Sep 27, 2006 19:11 UTC (Wed) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link] (7 responses)

Didn't work for CSS, won't work now. Microsoft can play whack-a-mole all it wants but, no matter how many billable hours it spends, it won't be able to stop people from removing DRM from their files.

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Posted Sep 27, 2006 19:22 UTC (Wed) by rknop (guest, #66) [Link] (6 responses)

But they can make lots of individuals' lives miserable in the mean time, which remains a miscarriage of justice even if DRM isn't something that can ever work in the long term.

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Posted Sep 27, 2006 19:59 UTC (Wed) by drag (guest, #31333) [Link] (5 responses)

Bah, screw Microsoft.

Just point out to people that this is the sort of crap they do and you simply cannot trust them. They'll put their marketting and their business partners ahead of you every single time.

I think that people have this impression that DRM is like this nessicary evil that comsumers will fall for in order pay large amounts of money to watch re-runs of old TV shows and movies on their computer and their cell phones. They maybe figure that it's a sham to make media companies happy and that like with Itunes with it's ability to burn music CDROMs that it's always going to be easy to work around.

So this guy comes out, makes a nice program to make people's computer portion of their lives a bit easier to stand while using Microsoft... And gets sued for it.

So MS is actually serious about inflicting DRM on it's customers.

Going to the lawsuit may not cost Microsoft much, but if they loose a few tens of thousand customers to Free software it will.

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Posted Sep 27, 2006 20:42 UTC (Wed) by rogerd (guest, #4170) [Link] (4 responses)

Unfortunately it will take tens or hundreds of MILLIONS of customers to get their attention. Other than that, I'm one on the ten thousand with you. Comcast is next on my hit list.

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Posted Sep 27, 2006 20:46 UTC (Wed) by mikov (guest, #33179) [Link] (3 responses)

Why Comcast ?

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Posted Sep 27, 2006 22:14 UTC (Wed) by rogerd (guest, #4170) [Link] (2 responses)

I really don't want to crowd this topic. Sorry.

Comcast seems like another monopoly in my area that is jacking with us to provide more DRM content, HDTV. I will have to succomb to their marketing methods and STB to receive anything beyond local channels, most of which I do not watch. Dish competes, but you have to have a dish and STB. I'm asking the networks to stay off the encrypted signals with at least part of their programming.

Microsoft sues over source code theft (News.com)

Posted Sep 28, 2006 1:57 UTC (Thu) by zotz (guest, #26117) [Link]

I, on the other hand, am looking for my cable company to go all digital and perhaps encrypted if it means I can keep my cable internet and drop my cable tv bill. Right now, I have to buy and pay for the tv side, which I don't want, in order to get the internet side.

all the best,

drew

IPTV

Posted Sep 28, 2006 4:51 UTC (Thu) by bryanr (guest, #25324) [Link]

High fidelity IPTV is here today -- it's just called USENET


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds