is the GPLv3 "similar in spirit" to the GPLv2?
is the GPLv3 "similar in spirit" to the GPLv2?
Posted Sep 27, 2006 0:08 UTC (Wed) by pinky0x51 (guest, #40742)In reply to: is the GPLv3 "similar in spirit" to the GPLv2? by mingo
Parent article: Why Torvalds is sitting out the GPLv3 process (Linux.com)
>the kernel developers wrote the other 7 million lines of code. Thus
what matters mostly is the Linux kernel contributors' view on this
issue.
>(and if you claim the FSF wrote the toolchain that's not true anymore
either, while the FSF has the copyrights assigned, both glibc and gcc was
largely written and is being written and maintained by non-FSF
people.)
What makes someone a Linux Hacker? Right, if he contributes to linux.
What makes someone a GNU Hacker? Right, if he contributes to GNU
software.
If the GNU or Linux hacker is employed by any IT company or if he does it
in his spare time or if i believes in the words of Linus Torvalds or in
the words of the FSF doesn't make any difference. If he contributes to
Linux,
he is a Linux Hacker and the result will always be linux and if he
contribute to GNU he is a GNU Hacker and the result will always be
GNU.
So yes, GNU is much larger than Linux.
Posted Sep 28, 2006 21:54 UTC (Thu)
by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458)
[Link]
Right. GNU is a tiny amount of code contributed for/by the FSF, plus everything they can freely share the source code to. In that sense, GNU is truly larger than Linux. But what the FSF has really contributed is a small fraction of that.
is the GPLv3 "similar in spirit" to the GPLv2?
What makes someone a Linux Hacker? Right, if he contributes to linux.
What makes someone a GNU Hacker? Right, if he contributes to GNU software.