Some Suggestions on LWN Letters and Subscribers
From: | Alan Hicks <alan-AT-lizella.net> | |
To: | editor-AT-lwn.net | |
Subject: | Some Suggestions on LWN Letters and Subscribers | |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:42:59 -0400 |
I wanted to weigh in on the "Letters to the Editor" page and maybe beat a dead horse or two. :^) As some one who has written in and been published on this page before, I would be mildly upset to see it removed. That page need not always be present, but when it is, I find it almost always has incredible content. I think it's unrealistic to assume that comments can take the place of a well formed e-mail created for publication. People tend to put more thought and time into such things. Also, you will find that some people may not be subscribers or regular readers and write in. For example, suppose LWN writes an article about certain actions in the community and ruffles some feathers (whether that ruffling is warranted is immaterial). The letters page gives those people a very prominent way to respond to both yourself, and the readership as a whole. Really, is there a need to remove it if every weekly edition does not contain a Letters page? As for subscribership, I had hoped that the send-a-link thing might help out, and a little feedback on this front would be helpful. I've forwarded a few links to small private mailing lists and my circle of geek friends for particularly interesting articles, but I don't think it's been successful in convincing even one person to subscribe. Something else obviously needs to be done to encourage subscribers. Some time ago when this discussion came up I suggested a general LWN mailing list for project developer subscribers. I still think that's worth looking into as a way to encourage $5 a month subscribers to up the ante to the full $10, and would be relatively easy enough to deploy in a test case. In the interest of full discloser to your readers, I am a $10 a month subscriber and have been for years. I was originally going to post this as a comment, but decided to make it a Letter to the Editor instead. :^) -- It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, Than for a man to hear the song of fools. Ecclesiastes 7:5
Posted Jun 29, 2006 7:03 UTC (Thu)
by beejaybee (guest, #1581)
[Link]
Posted Jun 29, 2006 15:49 UTC (Thu)
by dwheeler (guest, #1216)
[Link]
Posted Jun 29, 2006 18:35 UTC (Thu)
by cventers (guest, #31465)
[Link]
Also, I like the idea about a mailing list for "Project Leader"
Posted Jun 29, 2006 21:00 UTC (Thu)
by proski (subscriber, #104)
[Link]
I agree. Totally.Some Suggestions on LWN Letters and Subscribers
I also think that LWN should keep the "letters" section.
I don't have a problem with it not being there every week;
that just means that when it's there, it's worth reading.
Keep LWN letters
Keep the letters, please, Mr. Corbet. :)Some Suggestions on LWN Letters and Subscribers
subscribers....
I think "Letters to the Editor" should be open for free access from the beginning. This would encourage potential writers by giving them much wider audience. We could see some letters linked to e.g. by Slashdot stories, bringing LWN more readers and potentially more subscribers.
Open the letters!