| From: |
| Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net> |
| To: |
| linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> |
| Subject: |
| [BENCHMARK] 2.5.52 with contest |
| Date: |
| Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:23:46 +1100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to the OSDL people I'm back online with their hardware.
Here are the latest contest results for 2.5.52:
UniProcessor:
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 70.0 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.50 [5] 69.9 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.51 [2] 69.8 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.52 [3] 70.2 96 0 0 1.05
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 67.4 99 0 0 1.01
2.5.50 [5] 67.3 99 0 0 1.01
2.5.51 [2] 67.2 99 0 0 1.01
2.5.52 [3] 67.5 99 0 0 1.01
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 85.2 79 17 20 1.28
2.5.50 [5] 84.8 79 17 19 1.27
2.5.51 [2] 85.2 79 17 20 1.28
2.5.52 [3] 84.4 79 17 19 1.26
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 210.5 37 2 50 3.15
2.5.50 [5] 189.2 40 2 49 2.83
2.5.51 [12] 195.8 39 2 50 2.93
2.5.52 [3] 222.3 36 2 53 3.33
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 106.1 82 2 9 1.59
2.5.50 [5] 107.5 81 3 9 1.61
2.5.51 [7] 107.0 81 3 9 1.60
2.5.52 [3] 109.8 81 2 8 1.64
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 184.8 70 3 8 2.77
2.5.50 [5] 189.5 61 4 9 2.84
2.5.51 [7] 163.7 67 3 8 2.45
2.5.52 [3] 161.4 69 3 8 2.42
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 127.4 57 14 13 1.91
2.5.50 [5] 142.6 54 19 14 2.14
2.5.51 [7] 125.6 58 14 12 1.88
2.5.52 [7] 120.9 60 13 12 1.81
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 97.4 75 7 11 1.46
2.5.50 [5] 106.9 69 10 11 1.60
2.5.51 [7] 105.1 69 9 11 1.57
2.5.52 [7] 94.9 76 7 10 1.42
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 88.2 80 15 6 1.32
2.5.50 [5] 88.5 80 15 7 1.33
2.5.51 [2] 88.4 80 15 7 1.32
2.5.52 [3] 88.1 80 15 7 1.32
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 81.4 85 0 8 1.22
2.5.50 [5] 81.2 85 0 8 1.22
2.5.51 [2] 80.8 85 0 8 1.21
2.5.52 [3] 81.0 86 0 9 1.21
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 98.1 76 43 2 1.47
2.5.50 [5] 98.3 76 44 2 1.47
2.5.51 [7] 99.3 76 45 2 1.49
2.5.52 [3] 100.0 78 45 2 1.50
Slight decrease in time for the io writing loads - io_load, io_other and
xtar_load.
SMP:
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [6] 39.3 181 0 0 1.09
2.5.50 [5] 39.3 180 0 0 1.09
2.5.51 [3] 39.6 180 0 0 1.09
2.5.52 [7] 39.3 181 0 0 1.09
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [6] 36.6 194 0 0 1.01
2.5.50 [5] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01
2.5.51 [3] 36.5 195 0 0 1.01
2.5.52 [7] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [6] 50.0 141 11 52 1.38
2.5.50 [5] 47.8 148 10 46 1.32
2.5.51 [3] 50.5 139 12 54 1.39
2.5.52 [7] 48.7 144 10 49 1.34
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 53.8 161 1 10 1.49
2.5.50 [5] 54.6 157 1 10 1.51
2.5.51 [7] 58.2 158 1 10 1.61
2.5.52 [7] 56.1 161 1 10 1.55
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 72.9 132 1 10 2.01
2.5.50 [5] 116.2 103 2 10 3.21
2.5.51 [7] 104.8 124 2 10 2.89
2.5.52 [7] 83.1 138 1 9 2.29
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 75.5 110 9 18 2.09
2.5.50 [5] 87.6 102 14 22 2.42
2.5.51 [7] 84.6 102 13 21 2.34
2.5.52 [7] 73.1 111 10 19 2.02
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 64.2 130 8 19 1.77
2.5.50 [5] 59.3 139 7 18 1.64
2.5.51 [7] 64.5 134 7 18 1.78
2.5.52 [7] 75.1 120 10 21 2.07
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 49.1 152 5 7 1.36
2.5.50 [5] 49.3 151 5 7 1.36
2.5.51 [3] 48.5 154 5 7 1.34
2.5.52 [7] 49.4 151 5 7 1.36
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 43.4 167 0 8 1.20
2.5.50 [5] 43.4 167 0 8 1.20
2.5.51 [3] 43.5 167 0 8 1.20
2.5.52 [7] 43.2 167 0 9 1.19
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 62.5 145 35 3 1.73
2.5.50 [5] 63.3 141 36 3 1.75
2.5.51 [7] 62.6 148 38 3 1.73
2.5.52 [7] 63.5 148 38 3 1.75
Changes all over the place seem to occur only in SMP with much smaller changes
in the UP results. If you look at the detailed results you can see very large
variations in run times for the io based loads (io loads, tar loads). It was
so different that the dbench_load changes so much it's not worth doing them
or reporting them. I'm not sure why the io based loads vary so much more in
SMP mode.
Archived and detailed results can be found here:
http://www.osdl.org/projects/ctdevel/results/
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9/xdWF6dfvkL3i1gRArJ2AKCaOE2BOo95XcGosilOpebq+sm+3wCeMMOV
FVKuU406l5tdAfSI9EmXYR8=
=+pg5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
