Goodbye semaphores?
Goodbye semaphores?
Posted Jan 6, 2006 3:22 UTC (Fri) by stock (guest, #5849)Parent article: Goodbye semaphores?
What about old source code which needs semaphores? What about old
binaries which need semaphores?
Do we really want to see linux become a eccentric vehicle like plan9 or
the GNU mach kernel?
Robert
Posted Jan 6, 2006 3:26 UTC (Fri)
by busterb (subscriber, #560)
[Link]
Posted Jan 7, 2006 14:40 UTC (Sat)
by jospoortvliet (guest, #33164)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jan 9, 2006 2:27 UTC (Mon)
by stock (guest, #5849)
[Link]
Posted Jan 9, 2006 18:51 UTC (Mon)
by MenTaLguY (guest, #21879)
[Link]
These are semaphores inside the kernel; userspace can still use Goodbye semaphores?
semaphores.
the old sourcecode needs to be fixed, and well - we all know to what Goodbye semaphores?
extend the kernel supports binary code... :D
linux-abi is still used by me. Goodbye semaphores?
If you're thinking of POSIX semaphores, those are something different; this change is part of the internal kernel APIs, not the userspace ABI...Goodbye semaphores?
