The end of gcc 2.95 support

Posted Dec 15, 2005 1:41 UTC (Thu) by dank (guest, #1865)
Parent article: The end of gcc 2.95 support

May as well drop 3.1, too. It was a runt
version that was quickly replaced by 3.2.

We're going to require 3.2

Posted Dec 19, 2005 19:05 UTC (Mon) by Blaisorblade (guest, #25465) [Link]

Indeed, the current -mm tree requires 3.2.

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patche...

And I know of _official_ (meaning from important developers) warnings against 3.0/3.1 GCCs - in fact, most distros switched directly from 2.95/2.96 to 3.2 (I know this for sure for Mandrake, for instance).