The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I)
The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I)
Posted Sep 14, 2005 19:50 UTC (Wed) by sjj (guest, #2020)In reply to: The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I) by fatrat
Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I)
Thanks for the pointer to Moneydance. Grumpy editor, would you include it in your review?
Posted Sep 15, 2005 9:09 UTC (Thu)
by fatrat (guest, #1518)
[Link] (4 responses)
It's a commercial non-open source program and our Grumpy Editor did say he was not going to look at commercial products. If you want to look at it, you can download a copy to play with.
Posted Sep 15, 2005 13:08 UTC (Thu)
by dayers (guest, #1602)
[Link] (1 responses)
I used gnucash for a while, but md is much, much better, IMO.
Posted Sep 16, 2005 15:27 UTC (Fri)
by jstAusr (guest, #27224)
[Link]
Posted Sep 16, 2005 8:19 UTC (Fri)
by guybar (guest, #798)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Sep 17, 2005 18:40 UTC (Sat)
by jstAusr (guest, #27224)
[Link]
Also, I worry about lock-in on programs like that and have no interest in them. Oh, sorry folks we've sold out to the monopoly I'm sure they will meet your future needs.
The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I)
Aaaw, come on! This isn't a religious issue, for all love. Since Moneydance is way ahead on features and useablity, why not give it a look? I'd rather see it the standard for comparison than Quicken.The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I)
Ah, a religious person complaining about religious people. Sounds about par.The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I)
The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I)
and our Grumpy Editor did say he was not going to look at commercial products
And with all due respect (which I have), he might have been wrong: at least as far as giving an example for what the standard in the non-free world is.
I have been curious about this for some time.
If you want to look at it, you can download a copy to play with.
Isn't the purpose of a "review" to do exactly this kind of "playing with" the products in the field, thus saving a lot of redundant work by a lot of readers ?
The license states "only for your own personal use", using it to write a review probably is not only for Grumpy Editor's personal use.The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I)