|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Note that X.Org has its own modularization project

Note that X.Org has its own modularization project

Posted Aug 30, 2005 16:54 UTC (Tue) by stef70 (guest, #14813)
In reply to: Note that X.Org has its own modularization project by stevenj
Parent article: Fedora: RFC: X.Org X11 modularization project - rpm package driver naming

Actually, there are only about 270 packages since each one is provided twice (.gz and .bz2).

That seems a lot but in fact the modularization will make most of the packages optionnal:
- 37 fonts including some for 'exotic' languages (arabic, cyrilic, ...) and old terminals (ibm, sun, dec).
- 28 drivers for input devices you probably never heard of (jamstudio, hyperpen , penmount, tek4957, ... )
- 41 video drivers (anyone using more than one or two?)
- 42 libraries (you probably want those) plus 30 packages for their prototypes (for developpers)
- The X server itself.
- The remaing 100 packages are old legacy X11 applications. Most of them are quite useless nowadays (viewres, appres, xmessage, xwd, xwud, xcalc, xclipboard, ...).


to post comments

Useless apps

Posted Aug 30, 2005 17:03 UTC (Tue) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] (3 responses)

Hey! I still use xcalc! Those newfangled calculators look fancy, but xcalc supports RPN mode. Must be time for a grumpy editor's guide to on-screen calculators...

Useless apps

Posted Aug 30, 2005 17:25 UTC (Tue) by stef70 (guest, #14813) [Link]

To be honest, I occasionally use some of those old X11 applications (xset, xdpyinfo, xhost, xrefresh, xkill, xgamma). Hardly xcalc! I would rather use 'bc' or one of the matlab clones such as octave.

Nevertheless, most of the new X11 users are now running a desktop like KDE or Gnome and can probably live without ever starting any of those applications.


xcalc

Posted Sep 1, 2005 0:35 UTC (Thu) by darktjm (guest, #19598) [Link]

Funny, I never realized xcalc supported RPN (never bothered reading the manual for something I thought was a too-simple calculator). Then again, it says "HP10C", which implies 4-item stack limit, which is too little for me (I started RPN w/ forth and moved to HP28 & its successors, which have "infinite" stacks). There are a large number of other X calculators that support RPN, though (alas, many are very heavy, but that's modern software for you). The ones I know of from back when I wanted something for my PDA: galculator, which looks a lot like a better, slightly programmable, xcalc (complete with 4 item stack limit), pgcalc, which can look a lot like a real HP calculator, but isn't even remotely, and doesn't seem to support X paste, grpn, which is RPN-only, and of course various HP calculator emulators and lookalikes. I just use a real HP calculator on my desk when I don't need cut & paste and bc or sh $(()) (algebraic, but dirt simple) when I do need cut & paste. Plus, as noted above, there are even heavier apps for calculation, like scientific number crunchers and CASs.

Useless apps

Posted Sep 1, 2005 19:45 UTC (Thu) by brouhaha (subscriber, #1698) [Link]

If the grumpy editor likes RPN, I'll be interested in his take on Nonpareil. :-)

[offtopic] Another calculator: orpie

Posted Sep 1, 2005 14:37 UTC (Thu) by bkw1a (subscriber, #4101) [Link]

Gotta put in a plug for orpie:

http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~pelzlpj/orpie/

RPN. Text. Mmmmmmmm!

Note that X.Org has its own modularization project

Posted Sep 1, 2005 21:30 UTC (Thu) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501) [Link]

xmessage is used in many scripts.

As for video cards: distros will probably install all of them by default, because it's much more convinient: you don't want to start installing an RPM the moment somebody plugs in a card.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds