Kernel testing and regressions: an example
Kernel testing and regressions: an example
Posted Jul 28, 2005 23:11 UTC (Thu) by rlrevell (guest, #23596)Parent article: Kernel testing and regressions: an example
This isn't the best example; the only reason this did not get noticed is that everyone who needs this feature is still using the rejected-from-mainline realtime LSM while waiting for the distros to catch up.
Posted Jul 28, 2005 23:54 UTC (Thu)
by corbet (editor, #1)
[Link]
Posted Aug 3, 2005 14:51 UTC (Wed)
by vlima (guest, #4405)
[Link]
I still don't get Ingo Molnar's statement that
If it was completely non-functional should this work?
I have to say that's kind of the point: by the time you get it from your distributor, it's a bit late to be testing it. Part of the process of making the kernel (or any other project) better is to test things before they get set into a stable release, and that is especially true for new features.
Kernel testing and regressions: an example
Updated pam and glibc that know about RLIMIT_RTPRIO and RLIMIT_NICE
are avaiable in Fedora's rawhide.
(And a hacked pam for Fedora Core 4 from Planet CCRMA.)
Kernel testing and regressions: an example
"... RLIMIT_RTPRIO is completely non-functional in 2.6.12" thought.
$ chrt -r 20 bash
$ ps -eo rtprio,comm | grep bash
- bash
20 bash