Merkey mispells 'subpoenas' (aka, solliciting to be on JM's hit list)
Merkey mispells 'subpoenas' (aka, solliciting to be on JM's hit list)
Posted Jun 17, 2005 11:33 UTC (Fri) by rev (guest, #15082)Parent article: Jeff Merkey rides again
He spells it as 'subpeonas'. Well, just a nitpick of course, of little substance. Not being a native speaker, I make lots of spelling errors, and worse, myself. The point is, there's little doubt in my mind that within Merkey's version of the law, spotting this spelling error and making note of it in a public forum qualifies as libel. And I desparately want to be on Merkey's libel lawsuit target list: I can use some fun.
Merkey reminds me of moonhoax crackpot Kaysing suing astronaut Lovell for libel.
The case was thrown out...
The similariry is striking.. crackpot is identified as such, upon which the crackpot sues the ones that charactarised him as such for libel.
Posted Jun 19, 2005 9:52 UTC (Sun)
by man_ls (guest, #15091)
[Link]
That's it, a subpeona is directed your way.
Merkey mispells 'subpoenas' (aka, solliciting to be on JM's hit list)