Gentoo Linux founder to 'educate' Microsoft (News.com)
Daniel Robbins, the founder and former chief architect of the Gentoo project, began working for Microsoft in late May, according to a posting this week on the Gentoo Web site. According to Gentoo, Robbins is "helping Microsoft to understand open source and community-based projects." Microsoft confirmed Wednesday that Robbins will have an educational role at the company."
Posted Jun 16, 2005 16:34 UTC (Thu)
by GeekBoi (guest, #24078)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Jun 16, 2005 17:13 UTC (Thu)
by Duncan (guest, #6647)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Jun 17, 2005 5:22 UTC (Fri)
by grouch (guest, #27289)
[Link] (1 responses)
D. Robbins current actions certainly seem to indicate that his interests are in money. Imagine the reaction to an announcement of Stallman or Torvalds or Volkerding taking a position at MS.
Posted Jun 20, 2005 6:38 UTC (Mon)
by hingo (guest, #14792)
[Link]
Posted Jun 16, 2005 16:39 UTC (Thu)
by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989)
[Link]
Posted Jun 16, 2005 17:31 UTC (Thu)
by gvy (guest, #11981)
[Link]
Posted Jun 16, 2005 18:24 UTC (Thu)
by einstein (subscriber, #2052)
[Link] (3 responses)
I don't understand how anyone with more than 3 brain cells could look at microsoft's frantic efforts to destroy linux, even their recent attempts in europe to get samba outlawed, and think for a minute that they have any goal other than to find more effective methods of attacking us?
Posted Jun 16, 2005 19:12 UTC (Thu)
by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989)
[Link] (2 responses)
>I don't understand how anyone with more than 3 brain cells could look at microsoft's frantic efforts to destroy linux, even their recent attempts in europe to get samba outlawed, and think for a minute that they have any goal other than to find more effective methods of attacking us?
Posted Jun 17, 2005 2:01 UTC (Fri)
by Mithrandir (guest, #3031)
[Link] (1 responses)
Can anyone say "software patents"?
> My biggest fear is a GPLv3 that is so extremeist in its evangelical zeal that the market totally vomits on the idea. In other words, when technically beat across the board, Redmond's best hope against the FSF is ideological judo.
I'm not sure that the kernel, at least, will switch to version 3. Seeing as Linus doesn't own the copyright on most of it, he can't unilaterally make the switch.
But seriously, considering the lengthy community consultation period the FSF keeps talking about, I don't beleive the GPL v3 will really be all that extreme. And Eben Moglen I'd trust with my life.
>>I don't understand how anyone with more than 3 brain cells could look at microsoft's frantic efforts to destroy linux, even their recent attempts in europe to get samba outlawed, and think for a minute that they have any goal other than to find more effective methods of attacking us?
Yeah, though it's conceivable that MS is big enough that one section is completely at odds with another on particular issues.
Posted Jun 17, 2005 13:00 UTC (Fri)
by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989)
[Link]
>And Eben Moglen I'd trust with my life.
>Yeah, though it's conceivable that MS is big enough that one section is completely at odds with another on particular issues.
Posted Jun 17, 2005 12:51 UTC (Fri)
by thompsot (guest, #12368)
[Link]
I hope DR has been thouroughly trained in the discipline of standing up under extreme manipulation...
Steve Ballmer: "Here's some more money... tell us what we need to know to further our efforts in destro... I mean, WORKING WITH our latest enem... I mean, FRIEND in the industry".
One would hope DR is just taking them for a ride for a while, gathering some easy income while MS thinks it's offer is actually buying it something worthwhile.
I'm not so sure this is the best person to represent the Open Source Gentoo Linux founder to 'educate' Microsoft (News.com)
community to anyone.
http://www.zynot.org/info/fork.html
Now this all may be one disgruntled developer not happy with another, but
it does raise some question in my mind about this gentleman's fitness to
the purpose.
A good look at the facts should reveal that most if not all of those Gentoo Linux founder to 'educate' Microsoft (News.com)
accusations were the result of a man mistaking his image in the mirror for
an assumed opponent. What I mean is that a close read of the facts --
even as presented on the zynot site itself, will demonstrate that the guy
making the accusations had nearly all the qualities he was accusing
the /other/ guy of having.
Ask yourself this. Daniel Robbins had a background in earlier Linux and
in FreeBSD, where he spent a few years and where he got the ideas for what
later became portage, borrowed from FreeBSD ports. He certainly had
enough background in free source and its various licenses to have a good
idea what he was doing, when he chose the policy of making the GPL the
license under which all Gentoo projects would sit. Does that sound like
the type of guy that's mainly interested in his own gain -- in taking it
private? Not to me it doesn't! Despite the accusations, there's little
or no evidence backing them up.
OTOH, take a look at the other guy and /his/ background, then take a look
at his stated plans for Zynot. He was forking Gentoo because the license
Daniel deliberately chose allowed him to do so. At the same time, he had
a whole list of criticisms based on his closed source background of how
open source was doing it wrong, and how Zynot would work so much better
with a top-down management directed environment. Anybody who's spent time
in the open source community should know how /that/ will go over with most
open source developers, and the community in general -- like a lead
balloon, which is about how Zynot ended up going over -- it never got much
of anywhere and was eventually dropped, despite being able to get a
jump-start from Gentoo's GPLed code. The guy basically had no feel for
the open source community and how it worked at all!
Contrast that with what happened to Gentoo since then. Yes, Daniel had
made some mistakes, but Gentoo was doing well before all this came up. It
had the potential of killing Gentoo but it didn't. In ordered to do the
best he could by Gentoo and prevent those personal accusations from
affecting Gentoo any more than necessary, DR did two things. First, he
completed the setup of the not-for-profit Gentoo Foundation as he'd always
promised, and handed over to it all his Trademark and copyright rights.
Second, after seeing that safely setup, he distanced himself from the
distribution he created, so the personal accusations still following him
to this day wouldn't affect Gentoo more than it already had.
You see, when I was considering switching to Gentoo, I checked all this
out (tho the NFP was still being setup and DR hadn't fully pulled out yet
because he couldn't until there was that legal entity to transfer his
claims to). As I said, it quickly became apparent what the /real/ story
was, from the guy making the accusations himself! Time has only proven
that to be the case.
....
Back on topic, I know not what Daniel Robbins is really doing at MS,
besides the headlines, but he's a pretty sharp dude, who has already paid
his dues to the FLOSS community. Whether or not MS (or part of it) has or
is changing, I'm convinced he believes it is or he wouldn't be there.
Ultimately, MS /must/ accept coexistence with open source and indeed
libreware as well, making its products available on the platform, or it
will be confined to a smaller and smaller portion of the market. What's
to say they (or at least some element of MS) hasn't realized that and the
recent noises about being friendly, while rather awkward and uncoordinated
so far, aren't the beginning of that realization. Whether or not they are
actually changing or are only faking, they've obviously convinced Daniel
Robbins, or I doubt he'd be there. I can only hope that he overpowers the
forces of the dark side, rather than them overpowering him, and he doesn't
get to mangled in the process. Time will tell, I guess.
Duncan
[ snipped out of context ]:Gentoo Linux founder sells out
> Does that sound like the type of guy that's mainly interested in his own
> gain -- in taking it private?
Personally, I think educating the worlds by far largest software company in Open Source is a good thing to do. I'd do it for free.
Gentoo Linux founder sells out
What MS then wants to do with that information is another question. But since we proclaim the gospel of openness, spreading information should always be a good thing, even "to the enemy".
...is its agnostic view towards the source of ideas.One thing I genuinely respect about Microsoft
MS would be less of a company if they were 'too cool' to examine the zeitgeist and go to the source of the fresh ideas.
I wonder if the overall progress of F/OSS isn't frequently blunted by the need to come up with Yet Another Make Replacement, instead of investing more time in appreciating/learning the value of existing ideas.
Well good luck Dan... and MS. (*grin* somehow)Gentoo Linux founder to 'educate' Microsoft (News.com)
IMHO No good can come of this. microsoft is only following the old playbook, "know your enemy", the better to destroy him. Gentoo Linux founder to 'educate' Microsoft (News.com)
>IMHO No good can come of this. microsoft is only following the old playbook, "know your enemy", the better to destroy him. Gentoo Linux founder to 'educate' Microsoft (News.com)
So, you foresee some 'nuclear option' whereby the F/OSS gains of the last 10 years can be magically erased?
My biggest fear is a GPLv3 that is so extremeist in its evangelical zeal that the market totally vomits on the idea. In other words, when technically beat across the board, Redmond's best hope against the FSF is ideological judo.
This is more realistic. But, again, I think it wiser to take a wait-and-see attitude towards it, lest jumping towards the first red flag be /exactly/ what they want you to do, grasspopper.
> So, you foresee some 'nuclear option' whereby the F/OSS gains of the last 10 years can be magically erased?Gentoo Linux founder to 'educate' Microsoft (News.com)
>Can anyone say "software patents"?Gentoo Linux founder to 'educate' Microsoft (News.com)
At the point that the absurdity starts to threaten cashflow, someone will play the Qoheleth card ("There is nothing new under the sun") and bury the idiot in prior art.
A strong endorsement. I like the GPL more from the 'sheer common sense' angle than the ethical angle, and I hope that the FSF doesn't become increasingly evangelical about it.
It's a fairly known fact that MS has a darwinian internal culture.
Gentoo Linux founder to 'educate' Microsoft (News.com)