GFDL does not...

Posted Mar 10, 2005 21:23 UTC (Thu) by giraffedata (guest, #1954)
In reply to: GFDL does not... by jschrod
Parent article: A day in the life of emacs

"not any less at fault" is fundamentally different from "completely at fault" or even "somewhat at fault." In fact, I have reserved judgment on who, if anyone is at fault and how much.

dvdeug said something else besides that he looks askance at this claim by RMS; he gave the reason -- that RMS is today doing the same thing he accuses Xemacs of doing in the past.

All I said is that the reason is wrong -- RMS's refusal to give the documentation license doesn't absolve Xemacs of any fault it might have.

dvdeug then added some different reasons to point the finger away from Xemacs and at RMS.