Desktop Linux is Windows piracy aide (Silicon.com)

Posted Sep 30, 2004 17:16 UTC (Thu) by mmarq (guest, #2332)
Parent article: Desktop Linux is Windows piracy aide (Silicon.com)

Another independent study like those, that show lower TCO for Windows... i'm sure they had choose study cases where there wasn't a tremendous windows Lock-on,... i'm sure nothing of lock-ons !!!...

As to this one is EASY:

HEY Michael Kannelos JUST TELL YOUR BOSS TO MAKE AN ACTIVACTION MECHANISM, WITH VERY STRONG ENCRIPTATION, SO THAT *ALMOST NO ONE* CAN BREAK... BE IT ON A EMULATOR OR ELSE...

When it was just *BEFORE* the official launch of Windows XP there was already posted from ASIA origin, (sorry dont have links anymore) technical articles how you can copy a certain hash file from one Machine to another and that way illegaly activate the same copy of WinXP through an infinite number of machines... and if that information was available that soon, then *IS FAIR TO ASSUME THAT THAT INFORMATION CAME FROM INSIDE*...

What is no wonder, Piracy is the main mechanism by which Microsoft maintains a firm grasp in the domestic and SOHO markets,... there the TCO is lower than Linux, because there almost nobody pay for Windows or Office anyway...

Desktop Linux is Windows piracy aide (Silicon.com)

Posted Sep 30, 2004 21:48 UTC (Thu) by mmarq (guest, #2332) [Link]

" *ALMOST NO ONE* "
Almost no one in the sense that i belive its a fraud, without a shred of a doubt, scientifically proved, to advertise that a given system remains unbreakable for a very large considerable amount of time...
...Oracle has moved with such a marketing play to only see a little after a published exploit to there supposed 'unbreakable' database system.

" (sorry dont have links anymore) "
I really had that link and erased it,... never used it anyway. And *worst* it appear published in a local small almost unknowned local publication of wish i guard a copy(know what i'm talking about). It should had been investigated no matter if Microsoft had correct it afterwards or not... or is that, that the world wide of BSA likes only exist to hassle companys that seem to have enough money to pay for the penaltys if they got caught ?

Marques