(E)LILO was discontinued a decade ago and removed from Debian.
(E)LILO was discontinued a decade ago and removed from Debian.
Posted Sep 26, 2025 2:33 UTC (Fri) by linuxrocks123 (subscriber, #34648)In reply to: (E)LILO was discontinued a decade ago and removed from Debian. by WolfWings
Parent article: An unstable Debian stable update
I also didn't say ELILO was updated or supported. But, since you mentioned it, I'll just say that I generally don't whether software is updated or supported, and I generally do care if it works.
Regarding boot menus, I've found the UEFI boot menu available with F12 to be sufficient, so I don't see a need for a separate program to provide that feature. Given all of the over-engineered nonsense built into UEFI, I'm pleased that the resulting mega-kludge can at least display a better boot menu than its predecessor.
But I'm still looking forward to CSMWrap being developed to completion.
Posted Sep 26, 2025 2:55 UTC (Fri)
by intelfx (subscriber, #130118)
[Link] (1 responses)
This comments section as a whole is about "Debian in particular", though. The commenter you were replying to is also, presumably, a user of Debian in particular.
So when you post a comment on an article (about Debian) replying to another commenter (a user of Debian) saying "Why would someone need [systemd's] bootloader? <...> ELILO still works" and then claim that it does not matter that ELILO is not, in fact, available in Deban, then you are simply being obtuse. HTHs.
Posted Sep 26, 2025 7:47 UTC (Fri)
by linuxrocks123 (subscriber, #34648)
[Link]
In that case, I expect compiling ELILO on Debian would be straightforward, and I also expect the old .deb file from whatever the last release to include ELILO was would probably still work. However, I don't use Debian and so have not tested that.
(E)LILO was discontinued a decade ago and removed from Debian.
(E)LILO was discontinued a decade ago and removed from Debian.
