Neat: but isn't this a type-1 hypervisor?
Neat: but isn't this a type-1 hypervisor?
Posted Sep 21, 2025 20:35 UTC (Sun) by quotemstr (subscriber, #45331)In reply to: Neat: but isn't this a type-1 hypervisor? by willy
Parent article: Multiple kernels on a single system
Because the libraries have to have something to talk to? It's like asking why we add KVM syscalls when we have kvm command line. Separate jobs.
Posted Sep 21, 2025 20:39 UTC (Sun)
by willy (subscriber, #9762)
[Link]
The patches are to do this automatically without library involvement. I think the latest round were called something awful like "Copy On NUMA".
Neat: but isn't this a type-1 hypervisor?
... no.