Fully Tagged PDF (even for math) is in the works for LaTeX

Posted Sep 19, 2025 2:46 UTC (Fri) by intelfx (subscriber, #130118)
In reply to: Fully Tagged PDF (even for math) is in the works for LaTeX by jschrod
Parent article: Typst: a possible LaTeX replacement

> Just in the last few years, a major undertaking starts to produce tangible results: LaTeX Tagged PDF https://latex3.github.io/tagging-project
> This is bound to be incorporated into the next TeX-Live release and thus will appear in all major Linux distributions in due course.

How does this help with UX of *writing* in LaTeX, which seems to be the major issue driving the competing developments (and specifically the subject of the article)?

<...>

I understand that LaTeX is something you relate to, but your response reads somewhat like this:

- Project A sucks at ABC, and I'm badly tired of it, so I don't wish to use project A anymore. I'm looking forward to possible replacements.
- But project A is the best at XYZ, so this proves we are better than project B!

Fully Tagged PDF (even for math) is in the works for LaTeX

Posted Sep 19, 2025 9:52 UTC (Fri) by Wol (subscriber, #4433) [Link]

AOL.

This seems to be a major blinker problem in FOSS. My brother's comments about his experience of Emacs at Uni 40 years ago are classic - when he first started he thought it was awful, impossible to use, way too complicated. Then after a year or two, once he'd mastered it, he couldn't imagine using anything else.

The reason Word conquered the world (and the reason I hate it) is because it was aimed at people who COULDN'T TYPE - the managerial guys who had professional typists, the couch potatoes who didn't do much, etc etc. WordPerfect - which I took to like a duck to water because it (on the surface) mimicked a typewriter - which failed in large part due to MS's dirty tricks - couldn't compete in the battle for the minds of the people with the purse strings, even though it was a much better professional solution.

FLOSS so often is such a super swiss army knife that anybody new approaching it is left thinking "but how does it fix MY problem ???". I use lilypond, and it's incredibly powerful, but the learning curve to access that power is almost impenetrable (it's driven by a variant of Lisp!).

Cheers,
Wol

Fully Tagged PDF (even for math) is in the works for LaTeX

Posted Sep 19, 2025 10:55 UTC (Fri) by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989) [Link] (4 responses)

Your attention is drawn to https://www.overleaf.com/

Fully Tagged PDF (even for math) is in the works for LaTeX

Posted Sep 19, 2025 11:21 UTC (Fri) by leephillips (subscriber, #100450) [Link] (3 responses)

Any particular reason? Using Overleaf is a distinctly worse experience than using a locally installed LaTeX with your favorite editor, Git, Rsync, etc. Although not as convenient for this as Typst, LaTeX can be set up to provide a live preview (but it will lag behind “live” when your document swells, as LaTeX lacks Typst’s incremental compilation).

Fully Tagged PDF (even for math) is in the works for LaTeX

Posted Sep 19, 2025 12:41 UTC (Fri) by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989) [Link]

In response to:

> the learning curve to access that power is almost impenetrable

One of my pet cliches is: "Everything is easy, when you know how to do it."

Overleaf provides a gentle introduction to LaTeX.

Fully Tagged PDF (even for math) is in the works for LaTeX

Posted Sep 19, 2025 13:17 UTC (Fri) by paulj (subscriber, #341) [Link]

Lyx has very good inline live preview support for Math. It's just 'compiling' the math snippet itself (with whatever environments/packages the doc is using) so it's near instant.

I'm a big fan of Lyx as a great accessible and fairly user-friendly UI for writing documents to eventually typeset with LaTeX. I've used it for my own dissertation and it made writing so much easier. It's also customisable. I ended up making a few of my own definitions for things, with their own menu entries - which was just a matter of adding some UI definition files.

My father went to uni after retirement and (eventually) got a masters. He used to have endless issues with his masters dissertation in MS Word, with the format going screw and *especially* the required citations being very hard to manage and constantly getting messed up. I was constantly having to go over to him to try help him with his MS Word processing issues. In the end, I switched him over to Lyx. Showed him how to make chapters, sections and sub-sections, and insert citations. Told him just to write, and that the formatting would largely take care of itself. I helped with proofing at the end and help with inserting figures and illustrations, but it saved *both of us* a lot of hair-pulling and time.

My dad generally does not get on with computers. He gets very frustrated with complex programmes, with states affecting things he can't see/understand. He became a big of fan Lyx however, for the way it just let him write and generally staying out of the way, while keeping track of all the citations and layout for him, and producing a beautiful doc at the end thanks to LaTeX.

Lyx is a _great_ bit of software!

Fully Tagged PDF (even for math) is in the works for LaTeX

Posted Sep 27, 2025 19:46 UTC (Sat) by callegar (guest, #16148) [Link]

Using overleaf has a unique advantage when you have a group of collaborators that use different OSs and have installed LaTeX using different approaches (e.g. one on Windows with MikTeX, another one on Linux with TeXLive, another one on Linux with distribution provided packages). It gives you a platforms that can be used as a reference: if the doc compiles fine there and it does not compile fine for a subset of the collaborators, it is easy to convince them that the issue is on their side.

A pain point is that the free tier is insufficient even for the simplest document with the LuaLaTeX engine.