Sounds like double ungood day for Linode
Sounds like double ungood day for Linode
Posted Jul 29, 2025 0:08 UTC (Tue) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)In reply to: Sounds like double ungood day for Linode by smurf
Parent article: LWN is back
Posted Jul 29, 2025 7:33 UTC (Tue)
by taladar (subscriber, #68407)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Jul 29, 2025 11:02 UTC (Tue)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link] (1 responses)
It's obviously not going to know about problems like "Bob has the key, but it is lost on his 100-key keyring", but it (hopefully) can notice things like "it says to get the key, but not where the key lives" that might be implicit knowledge in the author's eyes but these instructions are those that really should have a thorough once-over by someone *not* intimately familiar with the process to help rid it of such implicit assumptions.
Posted Jul 29, 2025 11:29 UTC (Tue)
by farnz (subscriber, #17727)
[Link]
While the LLM made a mistake here (since there's two people you rely on, not one), it's still highlighted that a document saying that 1 of 4 roles is needed to recover has, in fact, become 1 of 2 people.
Sounds like double ungood day for Linode
Sounds like double ungood day for Linode
It can also do things like decide that certain job titles imply particular people (not reliably, but often enough to be useful), and then highlight that your recovery plans depend on Chris being present at site, because Chris is the Site Manager, the Health and Safety Lead, and the Chief Electrician, and your plans depend on the Site Manager, the Health and Safety Lead, the Chief Electrician, or the Deputy Chief Electrician being on site.
LLMs looking over your recovery plan