No disclosure for LLM-generated patch?
No disclosure for LLM-generated patch?
Posted Jun 27, 2025 13:38 UTC (Fri) by drago01 (subscriber, #50715)In reply to: No disclosure for LLM-generated patch? by excors
Parent article: Supporting kernel development with large language models
Well one of the reviewers would be the patch submitter, who used the LLM to save time.
If you don't trust that person and don't review his submission in detail the problem is unrelated to whether a LLM has been used or not.
Posted Jun 27, 2025 15:10 UTC (Fri)
by SLi (subscriber, #53131)
[Link]
No disclosure for LLM-generated patch?
Exactly. The submitter takes the responsibility for the sanity of the submissions. If it is bad, that's on them. It doesn't matter that they found it convenient to edit the scheluder code in MS Word.