Open Source and Free Documentation Licenses, Part 1: The GNU FDL (O'ReillyNet)

Posted Sep 17, 2004 20:47 UTC (Fri) by mmarsh (subscriber, #17029)
In reply to: Open Source and Free Documentation Licenses, Part 1: The GNU FDL (O'ReillyNet) by uriel
Parent article: Open Source and Free Documentation Licenses, Part 1: The GNU FDL (O'ReillyNet)

Yeah, I took a look at the article to see if that was made clearer, which it is. The author was solely referring to the "viral" (do we have a better term for this?) nature of the license.

Open Source and Free Documentation Licenses, Part 1: The GNU FDL (O'ReillyNet)

Posted Sep 17, 2004 23:27 UTC (Fri) by kalgan (guest, #23843) [Link]

~~viral~~ copyleft ?

Replacement for the ``viral'' epithet

Posted Sep 18, 2004 16:43 UTC (Sat) by Max.Hyre (subscriber, #1054) [Link]

``continuous''?
``reciprocal''? (which the author used a number of times)
``undetachable''? (ungainly)
``inherited''?