Back to basics: Are weights software at all?
Back to basics: Are weights software at all?
Posted May 20, 2025 22:18 UTC (Tue) by acarno (subscriber, #123476)In reply to: Back to basics: Are weights software at all? by NYKevin
Parent article: Debian AI General Resolution withdrawn
For an ML model, however, whether it's a GPT or a Bayesian classifier, changing the weights can substantially affect the function of the overall software package. Whether the weights constitute a Turing-complete system is (in my opinion) irrelevant - there are plenty of useful non-Turing-complete systems. What matters is: without those weights, the application using them is unable to function properly. Thus, I think you _have_ to consider them a critical component of the software.
Posted May 21, 2025 17:28 UTC (Wed)
by NYKevin (subscriber, #129325)
[Link] (1 responses)
Changing the control points of a non-raster font substantially affects the function of the font, because it makes the difference between an "A" and an unrecognizable blob.
Posted May 21, 2025 19:19 UTC (Wed)
by intelfx (subscriber, #130118)
[Link]
Yes, but it's still fundamentally *content*: it only impacts human perception of the program, not the functionality and the behavior of the *program itself*.
Just like a PNG icon in an email application: changing that icon makes the difference between a recognizable button on a control panel and an unrecognizable one, but it's still *content*, not code.
Back to basics: Are weights software at all?
Back to basics: Are weights software at all?
