Flee from Meta

Posted Jan 29, 2025 22:34 UTC (Wed) by LtWorf (subscriber, #124958)
In reply to: Flee from Meta by hkario
Parent article: Linux-related discussion as a cybersecurity threat

It is available, but not "apt instal" available, having it on the pinephone or such devices is a major complication, while telegram just works.

Also the fact that very institutional USA players promote signal heavily makes me suspect it's not as safe as advertised. But that's just my paranoia. Not that telegram is safe at all.

Flee from Meta

Posted Jan 30, 2025 10:17 UTC (Thu) by tajyrink (subscriber, #2750) [Link]

Yes, ironically Telegram _clients_ are more open and free software than Signal is. You can write your own Telegram client (and many have, thus you have native clients on different mobile Linux OSs) while Signal actively disallows third party clients. And you can install Telegram fork from F-Droid, etc.

Sure, Signal is e2e, but if exaggerating it's e2e in a bit similar sense than Whatsapp is. It has a long history of including proprietary binary blobs and being only available in proprietary stores (I mean places from where you also get automatic updates). Even though on the other hand there is work on reproducible builds, their actions drive people to actively install it from places like Google Play instead of something that community could more easily verify.

I do prefer Signal at the moment for its functionality and theoretically well proven security, but I've started to use Matrix more as well.