|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Why no sysctl?

Why no sysctl?

Posted Jan 24, 2025 7:16 UTC (Fri) by geuder (guest, #62854)
Parent article: The trouble with the new uretprobes

I fail to see why they don't want a sysctl. Of course there are too many... But from a kernel perspective that seems the best solution to me. Just let the distro decide what user experience they want to give: Best performance, but legacy code might fail or maximum compatibility with a performance hit. And the expert user can switch if their need is different than what the distro chose.


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds