Good example

These are two entirely different situations, though. In the case of bcachefs, there was a clear, obvious and inarguable violation of the rules, in public, and those in charge were able to point at it and say "this is the issue!", and they had genuine back-forth discussions with him. In the case of Peters, as outlined in the article, we still don't know what he did wrong and what parts of what messages were violations of policies.