Welte v. Skype going to trial
Interestingly, Skype is arguing against the validity of the GPL as a whole, asserting that it is violating anti-trust regulation and similarly strange claims."
Posted May 7, 2008 18:54 UTC (Wed)
by and (guest, #2883)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted May 7, 2008 19:02 UTC (Wed)
by dowdle (subscriber, #659)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted May 7, 2008 19:21 UTC (Wed)
by ericc72 (guest, #41737)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted May 8, 2008 2:22 UTC (Thu)
by jamesh (guest, #1159)
[Link]
Posted May 7, 2008 19:27 UTC (Wed)
by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
[Link]
This case is about a GPL violation of Skype, related to their sales of Wifi Skype phones based on the Linux operating system kernel.
Posted May 7, 2008 20:03 UTC (Wed)
by vblum (guest, #1151)
[Link]
Posted May 7, 2008 20:49 UTC (Wed)
by gvy (guest, #11981)
[Link] (6 responses)
Posted May 8, 2008 0:25 UTC (Thu)
by rahvin (guest, #16953)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted May 8, 2008 0:41 UTC (Thu)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Posted May 8, 2008 7:25 UTC (Thu)
by ekj (guest, #1524)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted May 8, 2008 16:32 UTC (Thu)
by khim (subscriber, #9252)
[Link] (2 responses)
Sure - if you do in fact have legal copy you can use that. But if license is null and void then surely you don't have a legal copy!
Posted May 8, 2008 18:56 UTC (Thu)
by gvy (guest, #11981)
[Link]
Posted May 9, 2008 5:57 UTC (Fri)
by ekj (guest, #1524)
[Link]
Posted May 8, 2008 11:31 UTC (Thu)
by NRArnot (subscriber, #3033)
[Link]
Posted May 8, 2008 14:50 UTC (Thu)
by dmk (guest, #50141)
[Link]
Welte v. Skype going to trial
Is this case about the source code of Skype or of the linux distribution
on the phone? I assume it's the latter since skype is clearly an
application running within its own address space and thus not a derived
work by standard gnu/linux convention...
Welte v. Skype going to trial
RTFA... it is tiny. From what little info that is there... Skype has a hardware phone
appliance that is based on the Linux kernel... which is like... kinda GPLed, right?
Welte v. Skype going to trial
Actually, the short FA didn't state much in regards as to what was in violation. I would
think the previous poster asks a valid question.
Welte v. Skype going to trial
The most likely candidate would be the same thing Harald has successfully sued people about in
the past: distributing the Linux kernel in violation of the license terms (i.e. without a copy
of the license or without the source or a written offer to provide the source code).
Harald's blog states:Welte v. Skype going to trial
Welte v. Skype going to trial
What idiot lawyer / manager does skype have in Germany? Given the history of court successes
of GPL violations here, that reasoning is plain stupid.
If they win, I'm going to sell my rented apartment to any and all interested buyers.
Or, has Gregory Blepp found a new job?
so what right to use Linux do they execute then?
AFAIK Skype cannot use Linux without accepting its copyright license (GPL); if they find the
license nonsensical they're fine to go elsewhere, not to violate copyright, no?
so what right to use Linux do they execute then?
If they find the license nonsensical then they have no right to use the code as the license is
the only way they have a legitimate use of the code in question. If they don't want to adhere
the license they are free to go elsewhere but IMO they are also liable to disgorge any revenue
to date to the copyright holders as the product is violating copyright.
They can't just stop using Linux, they have to pay damages.
so what right to use Linux do they execute then?
s/use/distribute/ above, surely.
so what right to use Linux do they execute then?
Sure they can. Anyone (who is in posession of a legal copy) can USE any computer program for
any purpose, you don't need a license for that.
Now, if they want to DISTRIBUTE the program they -do- need permission from the
copyright-holder(s). For a GPLd program, one way of getting that permission would be to comply
with the GPL.
Another way would be to contact the copyright-holders and negotiate alternative arrangements.
In the case of the Linux kernel though, that is practically impossible since there are so many
distinct copyright-holders, and you'd need to negotiate a deal with every one of them, many of
which have no interest in such a deal.
Who is in posession of a legal copy? How?
err-ata
Er... my bad, meant "embed and sell" (that is "distribute") as "use". Should have been
sleeping for good %)
Who is in posession of a legal copy? How?
The license doesn't at all enter into the question of if you've got a legal copy or not.
If you go to www.kernel.org and download a copy of the linux kernel, this is a legal copy of
Linux. It is because www.kernel.org does infact have permission to distribute it to you (they
have this permission because THEY follow the rules stipulated in the GPL)
Now you are free to use this single copy of Linux any way you want without even READING the
GPL, much less adhere to it. It does in no way matter if you've got a license or not, you
don't NEED one.
The moment you want to do something that is otherwise prohibited by copyright-law, such as
distributing copies of the kernel to others, THEN you need a permission -- which the attached
GPL will give you on certain conditions. But only then. If you do -NOT- plan to distribute,
say you're only planning to use Linux on your own computer, then the GPL does not restrict you
in any way. (it even says so in the GPL, but even if it didn't, this would be the case)
I really don't understand why people persist in thinking they need a LICENCE to do something
that is allowed by default.
You only need a licence if you want to do something that is FORBIDDEN by default. (such as
distributing and copying the creative work of someone else)
Welte v. Skype going to trial
Skype is owned by E-bay, isn't it?
If so, someone should try to open channels to the top level management of that company, get
them to call off the rabid lawyers in their Skype division.
Don't E-bay's servers run Linux? If Skype is in violation of the GPL, couldn't it shut down
their entire business, not just Skype?
Welte v. Skype going to trial
http://www.linux-magazin.de/news/skype_gegen_harald_welte...
that means gpl 1, skype 0 \o/
(and game over)