LWN: Comments on "The first half of the 6.10 merge window" https://lwn.net/Articles/973687/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The first half of the 6.10 merge window". en-us Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:10:35 +0000 Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:10:35 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net The first half of the 6.10 merge window https://lwn.net/Articles/974084/ https://lwn.net/Articles/974084/ mb <div class="FormattedComment"> Can't you just renice the workqueues from userspace?<br> </div> Fri, 17 May 2024 14:59:31 +0000 The first half of the 6.10 merge window https://lwn.net/Articles/973982/ https://lwn.net/Articles/973982/ intgr <div class="FormattedComment"> <span class="QuotedText">&gt; The dm-crypt device-mapper target has a new high_priority option that allows it to use high-priority workqueues for its processing. This option can improve performance on larger systems, but defaults to "off" to avoid creating latency problems for other workloads (such as audio processing) on smaller systems.</span><br> <p> Sounds like there should be multiple priority levels?<br> <p> </div> Fri, 17 May 2024 11:00:23 +0000 The first half of the 6.10 merge window https://lwn.net/Articles/973952/ https://lwn.net/Articles/973952/ pbonzini <div class="FormattedComment"> Oh, so in the end there's a single type for both absolute times and deltas. It would be interesting to have a summary of what happened since <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/924746/.">https://lwn.net/Articles/924746/.</a><br> <p> (Referring to the Rust ktime_t abstraction).<br> </div> Thu, 16 May 2024 22:02:39 +0000