LWN: Comments on "The value of privacy policies" https://lwn.net/Articles/95515/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The value of privacy policies". en-us Sun, 12 Oct 2025 07:27:43 +0000 Sun, 12 Oct 2025 07:27:43 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net this make all signed but unread contracts unenforcable https://lwn.net/Articles/96061/ https://lwn.net/Articles/96061/ ernest In fact anybody could claim they just didn't read it in the first place, if that's convenient.<br> <p> I think, though, that that juge overstepped it's bounds by declaring these privacy statement can be overrulled as nobody reads them anyway.<br> <p> This outcome made everybodies jaws drop by about a meter over at Groklaw.<br> <p> Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:44:15 +0000 The value of privacy policies https://lwn.net/Articles/95686/ https://lwn.net/Articles/95686/ knobunc Well, that's fine as long as the same holds true for their &quot;Terms of Use&quot;.<p>Somehow, I doubt that a court will let that slide... &quot;Yer Honor, I admit that I scraped the content off the site, but I hadn't read the Terms of Use, so it is okay.&quot;<p>-ben Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:41:38 +0000 Alternative lawsuit https://lwn.net/Articles/95608/ https://lwn.net/Articles/95608/ pm101 Would it be possible to resue over false advertising, rather than breach-of-contract? Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:14:37 +0000