LWN: Comments on "Jörg Schilling is gone" https://lwn.net/Articles/872489/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Jörg Schilling is gone". en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:31:18 +0000 Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:31:18 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/874084/ https://lwn.net/Articles/874084/ john.carter <div class="FormattedComment"> In retrospect, much of the pain of the early days centered around painfulness of SCSI and CD formats.<br> <p> I admire his skill and tenacity in creating something that did battle with various painful low level API&#x27;s and formats on multiple platforms.... and worked.<br> <p> Yes, some of his software could be a beast to drive.... but that merely reflected the insane complexity of the devices and formats they were driving.<br> <p> If modern cd recording software is clean and easy... it&#x27;s because some of the api&#x27;s have become standardised and saner, and we&#x27;re ignoring and not using a vast array of megaconfigurable options in the formats.<br> <p> If he became a bit cranky about supporting all that... yup, I&#x27;d be too.<br> <p> Rest now Jörg!<br> </div> Wed, 27 Oct 2021 05:28:07 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/873345/ https://lwn.net/Articles/873345/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt;I cannot imagine a more fitting tribute to his legacy.</font><br> <p> It is surely what he would have wanted.<br> </div> Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:05:10 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/873117/ https://lwn.net/Articles/873117/ malor <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt;Bah... Jörg put his pride in his software and did not like others to distribute modified versions with issues that might reflect poorly on him.</font><br> <p> Downstream versions might suppress some of his verbosity about what he thought were bad choices, but I don&#x27;t remember hearing about them changing the code itself. I believe he was pissed off about all those &quot;warning&quot; messages being removed, the ones telling the user that the Linux kernel was making bad choices. Criticizing people&#x27;s systems is not what utility programs are supposed to be doing. Why should anyone have to sit through a screed telling them that Linux sucked every time they burned a CD? It&#x27;s the same approximate behavior as RMS always interjecting himself into conversations whenever he saw people use the word &quot;Linux&quot; in a way he didn&#x27;t like. Both behaviors were extremely impolite.<br> <p> Instead, by switching to the CDDL, he &quot;fixed&quot; the problem by making sure nobody else distributed his code at all. If expressing his opinion was that important to him, well, he hit on a solution that stopped people suppressing those weird messages, but it was pretty clear that he was unhappy with the overall outcome. <br> <p> <font class="QuotedText">&gt;We has lost a skilled hacker.</font><br> <p> I&#x27;m not sure he was really a part of &#x27;we&#x27;, in more than the general sense of being a human being who was skilled at computer programming. From what I can see, he shut himself out of the GPL community pretty much completely. So we in the sense of &quot;all of humanity&quot; are poorer for his loss, but we in the sense of &quot;the GPL community&quot; aren&#x27;t really impacted, because AFAICT he wasn&#x27;t a member anymore. <br> <p> It was more important to him to say, over and over and over again, to hundreds of thousands of users, that Linux sucked.<br> <p> </div> Sat, 16 Oct 2021 15:01:34 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/873116/ https://lwn.net/Articles/873116/ ballombe <div class="FormattedComment"> Bah... Jörg put his pride in his software and did not like others to distribute modified versions with issues that might reflect poorly on him.<br> He was far from being alone, the whole perl license (Artistic) was written for a similar purpose, albeit more diplomatically.<br> He was also not the only one to find Linux amateurish compared to Solaris circa 2005.<br> <p> We has lost a skilled hacker.<br> </div> Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:10:13 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872998/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872998/ watersb <div class="FormattedComment"> Jörg Schillling&#x27;s &quot;s tar&quot; archiver was an education for me. I have long since lost (and forgotten) the emails I exchanged with him regarding some bug or another; another idiosyncratic learning opportunity for me...<br> <p> And here we are, arguing.<br> <p> I cannot imagine a more fitting tribute to his legacy.<br> </div> Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:08:48 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872993/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872993/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; I wonder how many people complain about Jorg while praising rms for the same mindset.</font><br> <p> RMS and FSF has a long history of resolving licensing issues like GPL violations in private and in good faith. I am not seeing the same mindset at play here.<br> </div> Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:05:16 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872987/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872987/ rodgerd <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; He obviously wanted to be a part of the community, or he wouldn&#x27;t have been complaining, but wasn&#x27;t willing to take even the tiniest step to actually make that happen, instead resorting to vague legal threats.</font><br> <p> I wonder how many people complain about Jorg while praising rms for the same mindset.<br> </div> Thu, 14 Oct 2021 20:14:51 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872983/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872983/ malor &gt;Once something is available that you consider strictly superior, why go back? <p> Because the rest of the community you supposedly want to be a part of doesn't agree that it's better, and <i>definitely</i> agrees that it's incompatible with their chosen license? Because adopting that license means that you're forever shut out of every distro, which you then complain about for the rest of your life? He obviously wanted to be a part of the community, or he wouldn't have been complaining, but wasn't willing to take even the tiniest step to actually make that happen, instead resorting to vague legal threats. <p> &gt;Meaningful to you, who wanted to use Jörg's software in a pre-packaged way. His software wasn't any less available to him, or to anybody who bothered to download a tarballs and compile themselves. <p> And I'm sure he and his tens of users were very happy. But obviously not happy <i>enough</i>, or he wouldn't have been bitching to all and sundry about his software not being included in distros anymore. <p> &gt;At that point the rift was unsurmountable, no matter the license. <p> Only for an entirely ridiculous person that was unable to appreciate the validity of the viewpoints of other people. The SCSI syntax he insisted on <i>wasn't even relevant anymore</i>. It offered no actual benefit, and just made things hard. <p> SCSI CDROMs were already very rare, even when he was arguing about it, and they certainly don't exist in any meaningful way now. Yet, he still insisted on a labeling model based on SCSI chains. It was ridiculous on its face, and you're being ridiculous to support it now and even pretend that it was any actual barrier to inclusion. <p> Thu, 14 Oct 2021 20:06:19 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872916/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872916/ pgeorgi <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; suddenly it was CDDL only</font><br> <p> That might be because the CDDL only started to exist in 2005. Once something is available that you consider strictly superior, why go back?<br> <p> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; just the slightest bit of self-awareness on his part would have allowed his skill and participation to be meaningful</font><br> <p> Meaningful to you, who wanted to use Jörg&#x27;s software in a pre-packaged way. His software wasn&#x27;t any less available to him, or to anybody who bothered to download a tarballs and compile themselves.<br> <p> The GPL/CDDL thing is a distraction and merely served as catalyst: people had been unhappy with cdrecord&#x27;s UI for a while at that point and moving from SCSI-style addressing to /dev/* style address was about the first thing wodim did. At that point the rift was unsurmountable, no matter the license.<br> </div> Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:22:47 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872782/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872782/ rmrf <div class="FormattedComment"> Very sorry to hear about his passing. I used his tools on Solaris.<br> </div> Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:26:10 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872780/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872780/ malor I always wondered why he didn't just switch back to the GPL, instead of insisting that he didn't need to, and that everyone else in the world was wrong. He never managed to convince anyone, and in effect completely sabotaged his own project. Just the tiniest bit of flex on his part, and distros would have happily included his software again. <p> From what he himself said (in the comments on the earlier linked LWN article), the switch to the CDDL was because someone was criticizing him in a way he didn't like. For all practical purposes, he destroyed his entire project because of spite about <i>one person</i>. He was happy to release under GPL before that, but suddenly it was CDDL only, and he would not come down off that hill, ever, no matter what. <p> I used cdrecord a lot back in the 2000s, and I'd have been happy to keep using it. But he actively made sure I couldn't, just so he didn't have to change his mind or his position in any way whatsoever. <p> I guess I mostly feel sad about it. He shut himself away from the entire community, when just the slightest bit of self-awareness on his part would have allowed his skill and participation to be meaningful. <p> I'm sorry he's gone. I wish I'd remembered that whole kerfuffle and tried to talk to him about it. I doubt it would have helped, but I wish I'd made the effort. <p> Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:55:37 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872779/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872779/ walex <div class="FormattedComment"> This is really sad news, and I admired Schilling for his many excellent contributions (in particular &quot;S tar&quot;) and the depth of his insight into system and software design. He did have a &quot;suffer no fools&quot; uncompromising attitude that might have grated on many used more to american style &quot;participation trophies&quot; and to using salestalk for everything, but still one of my heroes.<br> </div> Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:47:41 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872698/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872698/ dd9jn <div class="FormattedComment"> I am sorry to hear that.<br> <p> Jörg was one of the just-a-few-years-older guys who introduced me to Unix conferences 30 years ago. In later years we had a few different opinons on technical details and free software history but he has always been a true and a fair hacker.<br> <p> Rest in peace, Jörg.<br> Long live *nix.<br> <p> Werner<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:47:28 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872622/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872622/ ajosey <div class="FormattedComment"> Jörg will be greatly missed by myself and others in the POSIX and UNIX standards community. He was dedicated in his work on the standard and a great contributor. I was lucky enough a few years back to meet up with him one evening in Berlin where he showed me the city. We had a few beers and shared our UNIX stories, it was a fun evening. He was passionate on the technical details and also had a great sense of humour. <br> __<br> Andrew Josey<br> Austin Group Chair<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:19:55 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872612/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872612/ flussence <div class="FormattedComment"> The first comment in the linked thread sums it up: tragic, more than anything.<br> <p> cdrecord was a necessary piece of software for many people. When I first discovered the cdrkit fork I felt a huge sense of relief at finally being able to use my hardware without being told I&#x27;m an idiot using a broken OS. I told myself I&#x27;d do better if I ever had software with users.<br> <p> Times have changed and I&#x27;m still stuck using unavoidable software that treats me like an idiot while it mutters under its breath about the OS being broken, but the new stuff has a big marketing budget and gives me a condescending smile and baby-babble error messages instead of insults; it just silently malfunctions and I lose weeks stumbling about blindly in frustration trying to hammer it back into operation.<br> <p> I don&#x27;t miss the edginess, but we&#x27;ve lost the honesty.<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2021 03:30:39 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872594/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872594/ larkey <div class="FormattedComment"> Having had the privilege of spending time as his intern, I can only echo what others have said: A remarkable character with unbreakable intention to do the right thing, to do better. Someone you could (and would, no choice!) argue for hours with. And even if you didn&#x27;t come to an agreement, you learned something.<br> <p> May you rest in peace.<br> </div> Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:46:13 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872578/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872578/ madscientist <div class="FormattedComment"> Wow. I can&#x27;t speak to the situation back in 2009 but over the years Jörg and I had many discussions on OpenGroup mailing lists regarding the POSIX standard for &#x27;make&#x27;. He never once left it unsaid that since GNU make was not published until 1987 or so, he considered it the upstart kid, thumbing its nose at its elder, &quot;more correct&quot; implementations.<br> <p> Nevertheless his passion to improve POSIX was always clear and uncompromising, and as much as they may engender frustration in the moment we need people like that to keep us honest and look out for the needs of the masses who rely on portability but don&#x27;t have a voice.<br> <p> His commitment and work ethic, not to mention institutional knowledge, will be definitely missed; RIP.<br> </div> Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:41:26 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872576/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872576/ wolfrider <div class="FormattedComment"> Very sorry to hear about his passing - I emailed back/forth with him a couple of times, he was a good coder<br> </div> Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:14:57 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872564/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872564/ blastwave <div class="FormattedComment"> I have had the privilege of working with Jörg and also a lot of laughs. His sense of humour was truely &quot;special&quot;. Even recently he was working on improvements to his SchilyTools code wherein it now builds and runs on z/OS systems as well as just about everything else one can imagine. I use the tools daily. We had some fun in the final days of the OpenSolaris project where we ended up joking a lot that our so called &quot;Governance Board&quot; was a joke all by itself. We had a lot of fun and did a lot of work to try to ensure that open and free software would not only be portable but also actually work. I really enjoyed how he kept a crew of people laughing about the wandering nature of his tomcat that often brought back little presents to him. It was only a little while ago we were chatting about why POSIX and open standards still matter more than ever and I think he was concerned we didn&#x27;t have enough beer to talk about the topic. I don&#x27;t know what I feel but I am very unhappy with this result. Right about now Jörg would say &quot;let&#x27;s just make the compiler switches a bit less crazy strict&quot; usually with a joke where I would wonder if something was lost in the translation. <br> <p> Dennis Clarke<br> RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC<br> UNIX and Linux spoken<br> GreyBeard and suspenders optional<br> </div> Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:59:30 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872565/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872565/ amacater <div class="FormattedComment"> cdrecord was the gateway drug to allow me to introduce FLOSS to a workplace. A Sun workstation had a hugely expensive CD burner attached. The software was also hugely expensive, didn&#x27;t work and kept two professional sysadmins working for two days to puzzle it out. cdrecord &quot;just worked&quot;<br> <p> That having been said: I watched the toll of the arguments over cdrtools vs. wodim, GPL and CDDL and the licensing mess which took its toll on a very valued colleague: great coder, valuable code but the concomitant fallout was very, very damaging. We are all complicated people: Joerg was more complex and less open to persuasion than almost anyone else.<br> <p> </div> Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:40:23 +0000 Jörg Schilling is gone https://lwn.net/Articles/872555/ https://lwn.net/Articles/872555/ marduk <div class="FormattedComment"> There are some things that I never saw eye-to-eye with Mr. Schilling, however I acknowledged that his &quot;frame of reference&quot; was a little different than mine. These days I find my own frame of reference askew with what is more generally accepted, so I can appreciate that now a lot more than I could years ago. I did/do appreciate his persistence and his contributions and can only imagine how different the Linux world would be without them. I hope that especially those from my generation don&#x27;t forget that. May he rest in peace.<br> </div> Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:06:04 +0000