LWN: Comments on "Roundup: managing issues for 20 years" https://lwn.net/Articles/869118/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Roundup: managing issues for 20 years". en-us Sat, 20 Sep 2025 10:24:56 +0000 Sat, 20 Sep 2025 10:24:56 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Roundup: managing issues for 20 years https://lwn.net/Articles/902612/ https://lwn.net/Articles/902612/ rouilj <div class="FormattedComment"> Just to close out this thread. Version 2.2.0 was released on July 13th and includes a Dockerfile that can be used with any of the database backends. It also includes a docker-compose file that will deploy it against a MySQL instance.<br> <p> I am working on getting an organization enrolled in the open-source program on docker hub to deploy the 2.2.0 release.<br> </div> Wed, 27 Jul 2022 02:50:28 +0000 Roundup: managing issues for 20 years https://lwn.net/Articles/869529/ https://lwn.net/Articles/869529/ rouilj <div class="FormattedComment"> I am not sure what you are trying to say. When using Berkeley DB, Roundup creates multiple database<br> files. One for each object/class and one for each journal (where all changes are tracked).<br> <p> When it uses SQLite as the back end there is one database file for the permanent data. Ephemeral data: session cookies, password reset keys .... are kept in a separate dbm file.<br> <p> <p> </div> Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:05:57 +0000 Roundup: managing issues for 20 years https://lwn.net/Articles/869528/ https://lwn.net/Articles/869528/ rouilj <div class="FormattedComment"> It is on a todo list, I probably should put up an issue for it. I have never needed it as I can just run the demo mode directly from the checkout.<br> <p> Are you interested in contributing a config?<br> </div> Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:00:05 +0000 Roundup: managing issues for 20 years https://lwn.net/Articles/869527/ https://lwn.net/Articles/869527/ rouilj <div class="FormattedComment"> Thanks for your interest. I develop my own sysadmin tracker using fossil, but I disabled the fossil issue tracker and run a roundup instance instead.<br> <p> Although using it as a wiki is possible, fossil&#x27;s wiki is probably a better choice.<br> <p> <p> </div> Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:57:42 +0000 Roundup: managing issues for 20 years https://lwn.net/Articles/869459/ https://lwn.net/Articles/869459/ scientes <div class="FormattedComment"> Dude, it is just one Berkley dB file.<br> </div> Fri, 17 Sep 2021 04:51:14 +0000 Roundup: managing issues for 20 years https://lwn.net/Articles/869322/ https://lwn.net/Articles/869322/ mrchapp <div class="FormattedComment"> No docker-compose?<br> </div> Wed, 15 Sep 2021 23:15:37 +0000 Roundup: managing issues for 20 years https://lwn.net/Articles/869320/ https://lwn.net/Articles/869320/ flussence <div class="FormattedComment"> This sounds promising, I&#x27;m surprised I didn&#x27;t hear about it until now because I&#x27;ve looked around for tracker software a few times in the past and they&#x27;ve all tended toward extremes of enterprise feature checklists or missing out on basic QoL.<br> <p> Recently I was looking for something to use as a local wiki and tracker, and ended up going with Fossil. That has an unbeatable featureset-to-weight ratio, but it really wasn&#x27;t designed with customisation in mind. Roundup looks like it does much better in that area.<br> </div> Wed, 15 Sep 2021 21:47:46 +0000