LWN: Comments on "Firefox 71" https://lwn.net/Articles/806215/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Firefox 71". en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:30:12 +0000 Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:30:12 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Firefox 71 https://lwn.net/Articles/806997/ https://lwn.net/Articles/806997/ flussence <div class="FormattedComment"> In the context of web development, there's no reason not to use Opus everywhere. Just polyfill it with JS for Apple Snobs, the same way we polyfilled WebP in Firefox until 2019 and Everything Else in IE.<br> <p> (Has anyone compiled Firefox itself to WASM yet so we can use it like Chrome Frame? That'd be one way to drag iPhone users kicking and screaming into this decade...)<br> </div> Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:38:37 +0000 Firefox 71 https://lwn.net/Articles/806880/ https://lwn.net/Articles/806880/ pabs <div class="FormattedComment"> There are much better choices for royalty-free audio codecs now, like Opus, which also has a common library too but I guess is supported by fewer platforms and audio tools.<br> </div> Tue, 10 Dec 2019 05:38:57 +0000 Firefox 71 https://lwn.net/Articles/806877/ https://lwn.net/Articles/806877/ tterribe <div class="FormattedComment"> Even though it still has plenty of technical limitations, MP3 is a royalty-free codec now, and should be preferred over encumbered, royalty-bearing alternatives.<br> <p> One of the advantages of that is that it *can* be implemented once, using a common library, instead of relying on integration with system codecs on every platform, using platform-specific APIs, just because you needed the platform vendor to pay the royalties. It's a much cleaner situation.<br> </div> Tue, 10 Dec 2019 02:00:16 +0000 Firefox 71 https://lwn.net/Articles/806243/ https://lwn.net/Articles/806243/ flussence <div class="FormattedComment"> It still feels mildly unsettling seeing MP3 get added to software like this, even though I'm aware it's been legally defanged for years now…<br> <p> Also relevant is the fact we've apparently been suffering bad fonts for a long time, according to this comment: <a href="https://redd.it/e5i714">https://redd.it/e5i714</a><br> </div> Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:22:14 +0000