LWN: Comments on "The Linux Foundation's CommunityBridge platform" https://lwn.net/Articles/782887/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The Linux Foundation's CommunityBridge platform". en-us Thu, 02 Oct 2025 21:11:04 +0000 Thu, 02 Oct 2025 21:11:04 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Free as in Freedom Podcast discussion about Linux Foundation Community Bridge https://lwn.net/Articles/784669/ https://lwn.net/Articles/784669/ bkuhn <p>Just noting this here for posterity if folks find this discussion later:</p> <p><a href="http://faif.us/cast/2019/apr/02/0x65/">Community Bridge was also discussed on episode 0x65 of <cite>Free as in Freedom</cite></a>, which is available in <a href="http://faif.us/cast-media/FaiF_0x65-Linux-Foundation-Community-Bridge.mp3">mp3 format</a> and <a href="http://faif.us/cast-media/FaiF_0x65-Linux-Foundation-Community-Bridge.ogg">ogg format</a>.</p> Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:30:08 +0000 The Linux Foundation's CommunityBridge platform https://lwn.net/Articles/783199/ https://lwn.net/Articles/783199/ em-bee <div class="FormattedComment"> "prefer to use single-point-of-failure, proprietary software rather than FOSS for their infrastructure" sounds a bit snarky ;-)<br> <p> greetings, eMBee.<br> </div> Sat, 16 Mar 2019 01:29:51 +0000 The Linux Foundation's CommunityBridge platform https://lwn.net/Articles/782937/ https://lwn.net/Articles/782937/ karkhaz <div class="FormattedComment"> From the response by Conservancy:<br> <p> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; supports the “BDFL” FOSS governance model, which has already been widely discredited</font><br> <p> u wot mate?<br> </div> Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:36:37 +0000 The Linux Foundation's CommunityBridge platform https://lwn.net/Articles/782933/ https://lwn.net/Articles/782933/ keithp <div class="FormattedComment"> For those who found the wall-of-text over at conservancy a bit daunting, here's the last bit of that post:<br> <p> "This new LF system is probably just right for FOSS projects that (a) prefer to use single-point-of-failure, proprietary software rather than FOSS for their infrastructure, (b) do not want to operate in a way that is dedicated to the public good, and (c) have very minimal fiscal sponsorship needs, such as occasional reimbursements of project expenses."<br> <p> Just another LF attempt to look like a part of our community and failing?<br> </div> Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:29:33 +0000