LWN: Comments on "4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1" https://lwn.net/Articles/769477/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1". en-us Wed, 10 Sep 2025 18:49:43 +0000 Wed, 10 Sep 2025 18:49:43 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/771379/ https://lwn.net/Articles/771379/ Wol <div class="FormattedComment"> Teenage Angst, the Galaxy, and part of everything :-)<br> <p> Cheers,<br> Wol<br> </div> Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:09:54 +0000 LED patterns https://lwn.net/Articles/771108/ https://lwn.net/Articles/771108/ robbe <div class="FormattedComment"> I must admit that I thought: when will BPF programs drive this?<br> </div> Thu, 08 Nov 2018 14:43:19 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/770205/ https://lwn.net/Articles/770205/ fartman <div class="FormattedComment"> It might be interesting to explore BPF as an alternative for grabbing information from the kernel, instead of resorting to netlink (and it solves the problem of parsing things in userspace, and is fast enough). The files on virtual fs can remain for human readability and legacy tools.<br> </div> Wed, 31 Oct 2018 15:37:12 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/770204/ https://lwn.net/Articles/770204/ fartman <div class="FormattedComment"> I can see why, probably don't want to deviate in that NETLINK_CRYPTO has already been the place for that kind of thing now.<br> <p> The problem to me appears to be the mixed granularity of procfs and sysfs. The former often has files varying in representation and results in more data being read than you need to, being slow. sysfs is granular with file-per-datum but when you need to collect a lot of things it quickly gets expensive.<br> <p> If you had some sort of readv where you could submit what files to read together, as some sort of megaread, and it took a new iovec type where one could specify file descriptors to read from, the sysfs model would work well, and you would only need to make the kernel fetch what you need to.<br> <p> It's still perhaps expensive in that you need to open all these files, but since that happens only ones per initialization (and all reads can be coalesced into one), i think it would help a lot. Then move all the snowflake files that don't belong in /proc to /sys/kernel/subsystem.<br> <p> Ofcourse, someone needs to do this work, and since netlink is good enough, I don't think it would happen.<br> </div> Wed, 31 Oct 2018 15:17:28 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/770148/ https://lwn.net/Articles/770148/ montjoie <div class="FormattedComment"> My first patch for cryptostat was using a /sys/kernel/crypto, but the crypto maintainer said to use netlink.<br> It seems that the rules for all crypto management is to use netlink.<br> </div> Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:20:50 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/770060/ https://lwn.net/Articles/770060/ fartman <div class="FormattedComment"> but netlink is also tied to network namespaces, don't you feel that's a little odd for something like crypto?<br> </div> Tue, 30 Oct 2018 19:30:01 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/770035/ https://lwn.net/Articles/770035/ nhippi <div class="FormattedComment"> Linux 4.20, serves the best clouds<br> </div> Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:51:01 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/770033/ https://lwn.net/Articles/770033/ johnsoda <div class="FormattedComment"> When releasing the 3.0 kernel, part of the reasoning that Linus states was that he couldn't comfortably count that high. <br> <p> Now, we are at the point where, does he consider 4.20 as being "Too high?"<br> <p> </div> Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:16:52 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/769919/ https://lwn.net/Articles/769919/ naptastic <div class="FormattedComment"> Why not both? :)<br> </div> Mon, 29 Oct 2018 20:47:21 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/769808/ https://lwn.net/Articles/769808/ nilsmeyer <div class="FormattedComment"> I'd prefer 5.0 and "Linux 2000" in keeping with "Linux for Workgroups" released some time ago ;)<br> </div> Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:06:38 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/769725/ https://lwn.net/Articles/769725/ mtaht <div class="FormattedComment"> I'd really like there to be a 4.20 release. There's all sorts of in-jokes to be made.<br> <p> I'd call it: smokey salmon.<br> </div> Sat, 27 Oct 2018 21:49:46 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/769681/ https://lwn.net/Articles/769681/ pbonzini <div class="FormattedComment"> Debugfs is a mishmash of interfaces, some of which might even let you get arbitrary code execution in the firmware; statistics can be retrieved and logged in production systems and it would be nice if production systems could avoid mounting debugfs altogether.<br> <p> It is also not particularly efficient if you want to log thousands of statistics every second.<br> </div> Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:19:35 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/769680/ https://lwn.net/Articles/769680/ lkundrak <div class="FormattedComment"> My first thought when I saw the crypto stats thing was: "Doesn't this belong in debugfs?" Why is a proc file or a netlink protocol better than debugfs for this sort of thing?<br> <p> I suppose it's mostly used for debugging and with debugfs you don't have to stick to a stable interface.<br> </div> Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:06:43 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/769679/ https://lwn.net/Articles/769679/ pbonzini <div class="FormattedComment"> I like the crypto statistics. It'd probably be good to have that for KVM too, instead of the current debugfs hack...<br> </div> Sat, 27 Oct 2018 09:40:51 +0000 4.20/5.0 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/769655/ https://lwn.net/Articles/769655/ jhoblitt <div class="FormattedComment"> The "LED pattern driver" looks useful -- this is something that I expect to be popular on RPIs.<br> </div> Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:58:43 +0000 Crypto side channels https://lwn.net/Articles/769638/ https://lwn.net/Articles/769638/ abatters <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; obtaining statistics from the cryptographic subsystem</font><br> <p> Could this be used in a side channel attack on crypto algorithms?<br> </div> Fri, 26 Oct 2018 19:52:07 +0000