LWN: Comments on "Some holiday stable kernel updates" https://lwn.net/Articles/742246/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Some holiday stable kernel updates". en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2025 13:28:32 +0000 Fri, 19 Sep 2025 13:28:32 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Some holiday stable kernel updates https://lwn.net/Articles/742379/ https://lwn.net/Articles/742379/ gregkh <div class="FormattedComment"> Given that the same bug is also present in Linus's tree, we are doing well with being "bug compatible" here :)<br> <p> Anyway, seems to be a compiler issue, see the long thread. It's easy to work around at the moment (change compiler versions or change kernel build options), so there are known solutions at the moment.<br> </div> Fri, 29 Dec 2017 18:01:43 +0000 Some holiday stable kernel updates https://lwn.net/Articles/742356/ https://lwn.net/Articles/742356/ flussence <div class="FormattedComment"> It's a shame these things happen, but I guess it highlights the fact that CPUs that aren't commonly found in “developer machines” are basically the wild west as far as support goes. I had a similar problem with a recent glibc crashing on Atom chips - that was a bit harder to recover from, but I learned why Busybox is installed by default that day…<br> </div> Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:03:03 +0000 Some holiday stable kernel updates https://lwn.net/Articles/742348/ https://lwn.net/Articles/742348/ jeffcook <div class="FormattedComment"> Note that 4.14.9 has caused a spate of issues, including inability to boot machines with CONFIG_MCORE2=y. Gentoo has masked it. See <a href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/28/64">https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/28/64</a> and <a href="https://bugs.gentoo.org/642268">https://bugs.gentoo.org/642268</a>. I was lucky and saw the message on LKML before rebooting. Very sloppy for a stable release.<br> </div> Thu, 28 Dec 2017 19:01:16 +0000