LWN: Comments on "CentOS and ARM" https://lwn.net/Articles/726441/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "CentOS and ARM". en-us Sat, 18 Oct 2025 11:26:18 +0000 Sat, 18 Oct 2025 11:26:18 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net CentOS and ARM https://lwn.net/Articles/726650/ https://lwn.net/Articles/726650/ pabs <div class="FormattedComment"> The primary processor on RPi systems is not an ARM processor. The system starts the VC4 processor first, which then runs the proprietary firmware that starts the ARM processor etc. The link above is libre firmware for the VC4 processor.<br> </div> Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:22:12 +0000 CentOS and ARM https://lwn.net/Articles/726648/ https://lwn.net/Articles/726648/ drag <div class="FormattedComment"> That would be unfortunate as the bootloader in ARM systems traditionally formed the initial 'firmware' that bootstrapped the system. <br> <p> This would me we are going backwards. <br> </div> Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:42:39 +0000 CentOS and ARM https://lwn.net/Articles/726647/ https://lwn.net/Articles/726647/ pbonzini <div class="FormattedComment"> I suspect that would be closed firmware -&gt; U-Boot -&gt; Linux, with U-Boot providing the UEFI runtime services instead of the UEFI firmware you see in x86 machines or ARM servers.<br> </div> Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:33:32 +0000 Benchmarks https://lwn.net/Articles/726628/ https://lwn.net/Articles/726628/ gmatht <div class="FormattedComment"> Now that these things are out, I was curious as to whether they have demonstrated better performance per watt. The only performance per watt benchmark I could find was from people who couldn't get CPU frequency scaling to work, and didn't as good performance per watt as Intel. [1]<br> <p> On the other hand the 96 Core Cavium ThunderX machines outperforms an Amazon c4.4xlarge instance at some tasks [2]. Packet offers them at 50c vs ~75c for the Amazon c4.4xlarge ondemand hourly rate, so they have demonstrated better performance per dollar in at least some contexts. (E.g. if you like the ondemand pricing model. Amazon's spot price is usually much lower.)<br> <p> [1] <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/10353/investigating-cavium-thunderx-48-arm-cores/19">http://www.anandtech.com/show/10353/investigating-cavium-...</a><br> [2] <a href="https://www.servethehome.com/exclusive-first-cavium-thunderx-dual-48-core-96-core-total-arm-benchmarks/">https://www.servethehome.com/exclusive-first-cavium-thund...</a><br> </div> Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:52:57 +0000 CentOS and ARM https://lwn.net/Articles/726620/ https://lwn.net/Articles/726620/ ardbiesheuvel <div class="FormattedComment"> If anyone is interested in collaborating on a true UEFI port for Raspberry Pi3:<br> <a href="http://www.workofard.com/2017/02/uefi-on-the-pi/">http://www.workofard.com/2017/02/uefi-on-the-pi/</a><br> <p> <p> </div> Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:45:49 +0000 CentOS and ARM https://lwn.net/Articles/726618/ https://lwn.net/Articles/726618/ johnjones <div class="FormattedComment"> "The 64-bit Raspberry Pi 3 (RPi3) will ostensibly be supported in three months or so, he said, once the U-Boot bootloader gets UEFI support."<br> <p> I hope the firmware is open like : <a href="https://github.com/christinaa/rpi-open-firmware">https://github.com/christinaa/rpi-open-firmware</a><br> <p> the minus marks against the raspberry pi is the closed broadcom firmware that you can not debug <br> </div> Wed, 28 Jun 2017 07:24:42 +0000