LWN: Comments on "Inside the OpenChain 1.1 specification" https://lwn.net/Articles/722249/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Inside the OpenChain 1.1 specification". en-us Mon, 20 Oct 2025 09:34:36 +0000 Mon, 20 Oct 2025 09:34:36 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Inside the OpenChain 1.1 specification https://lwn.net/Articles/722423/ https://lwn.net/Articles/722423/ SLi <div class="FormattedComment"> The specification requires mandatory training for all Software Staff. While I understand where they're coming from, I'm dead set against such corporate bullshit designed for the lowest common denominator mandated for everybody. In fact, the amount of mandatory trainings on subjects I'm already comfortable with is a significant factor in deciding where I want to work.<br> </div> Thu, 11 May 2017 10:46:55 +0000 Inside the OpenChain 1.1 specification https://lwn.net/Articles/722287/ https://lwn.net/Articles/722287/ k3ninho <div class="FormattedComment"> There's more information in the link to the report on the conference at the 2017 Free Software Legal and Licensing Workshop (see also <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/721698/">https://lwn.net/Articles/721698/</a> ). That has the details you seek.<br> <p> K3n.<br> </div> Wed, 10 May 2017 10:56:50 +0000 Inside the OpenChain 1.1 specification https://lwn.net/Articles/722284/ https://lwn.net/Articles/722284/ aleXXX <div class="FormattedComment"> A short note in the first paragraph what OpenChain actually is would be nice (the same applies to the Cinnamon announcement, where I wasn't quite sure whether that was a distro or one of those forked desktops).<br> </div> Wed, 10 May 2017 07:02:46 +0000 Inside the OpenChain 1.1 specification https://lwn.net/Articles/722259/ https://lwn.net/Articles/722259/ jkingweb <div class="FormattedComment"> That was a helpful summary; thank you. If it's only twelve pages, I may read it sooner than I'd planned. <br> </div> Tue, 09 May 2017 19:37:22 +0000