LWN: Comments on "Linux video editing in real time with Open Broadcast Studio (Opensource.com)" https://lwn.net/Articles/667524/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Linux video editing in real time with Open Broadcast Studio (Opensource.com)". en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2025 02:47:58 +0000 Mon, 15 Sep 2025 02:47:58 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Linux video editing in real time with Open Broadcast Studio (Opensource.com) https://lwn.net/Articles/668246/ https://lwn.net/Articles/668246/ nye <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt;But: so we don't confuse the actual audience who cares about this, let us all call it "switching", not "editing",</font><br> <p> Except in most of the English-speaking world where it's called 'mixing' (presumably by direct analogy with audio).<br> </div> Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:16:21 +0000 Linux video editing in real time with Open Broadcast Studio (Opensource.com) https://lwn.net/Articles/668143/ https://lwn.net/Articles/668143/ Baylink <div class="FormattedComment"> But: so we don't confuse the actual audience who cares about this, let us all call it "switching", not "editing", even if the people who make it get it wrong?<br> <p> There is an objective "right" term for this after 70 years of live TV, and "editing" is not that term.<br> </div> Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:56:25 +0000 Linux video editing in real time with Open Broadcast Studio (Opensource.com) https://lwn.net/Articles/667632/ https://lwn.net/Articles/667632/ flussence <div class="FormattedComment"> I've been using this for a few months now and it's pretty nice. The biggest advantage over vanilla command-line ffmpeg, IMHO, is its internal window compositor. FFmpeg's x11grab by comparison is a little on the useless side, limited to old-style X11 rectangle geometry syntax for customization.<br> </div> Sat, 12 Dec 2015 16:52:14 +0000 Linux video editing in real time with Open Broadcast Studio (Opensource.com) https://lwn.net/Articles/667580/ https://lwn.net/Articles/667580/ fratti <div class="FormattedComment"> Similar free software, with a less nice interface but remotely controllable, would be Snowmix, by the way. While it has some powerful features, it also has quite a steep learning curve. I hope to spend an afternoon actually looking into it more, since it seems to provide a system more focused towards amateur TV broadcasts.<br> <p> That being said, I'm very impressed with OBS. I've been using it for a while to stream both to my own server (running nginx-rtmp) and Twitch, and it honestly has been a fairly good experience on the OBS side of things. I imagine though that for more complex streaming setups, some things such as maybe Jack integration or multiple outputs would be useful.<br> </div> Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:36:04 +0000