LWN: Comments on "Some 3.18 development statistics" https://lwn.net/Articles/620827/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Some 3.18 development statistics". en-us Mon, 29 Sep 2025 07:21:49 +0000 Mon, 29 Sep 2025 07:21:49 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Novell vs SUSE https://lwn.net/Articles/625164/ https://lwn.net/Articles/625164/ corbet Oops...that crept in when I fixed up the employer table. Fixed. Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:28:40 +0000 Novell vs SUSE https://lwn.net/Articles/625162/ https://lwn.net/Articles/625162/ fcrozat <div class="FormattedComment"> It looks like the first column is using "SUSE" as employer but the second one is still using "Novell" instead of SUSE (this is not the case on <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/624330/">https://lwn.net/Articles/624330/</a> btw)<br> </div> Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:26:56 +0000 McAfee vs. Intel https://lwn.net/Articles/624935/ https://lwn.net/Articles/624935/ robbe <div class="FormattedComment"> According to mcafee.com the company line is (still) to identify as a seperate entity. (But the "Intel Security" name has been looming on the sidelines for some time.) I have a hard time imagining individual developers that would identify *more* with Intel than their corporate overlords do.<br> </div> Sat, 06 Dec 2014 21:22:57 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/624411/ https://lwn.net/Articles/624411/ josh <div class="FormattedComment"> I think we should draw the line wherever the entity in question wants it drawn. Subsidiaries that want to be counted as a completely separate entity (and that make it easy to do so, such as by using a separate @othercompany.example.com) can get counted separately; subsidiaries that consider their contributions part of the parent company should get counted as such.<br> <p> So, in this case: do the McAfee folks *want* to be counted as part of Intel or as a separate entity?<br> </div> Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:46:13 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/624191/ https://lwn.net/Articles/624191/ aryonoco <div class="FormattedComment"> It is. <br> <p> Do we count subsidiaries as a different company or as part of their parent? I think the line is very arbitrary. <br> </div> Wed, 03 Dec 2014 05:40:31 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623724/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623724/ robbe <div class="FormattedComment"> I am similarily intrigued. Maybe LWN would be interested to run a feature about Mr. Sweeten and the Comedi drivers?<br> </div> Sun, 30 Nov 2014 20:18:40 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623546/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623546/ dberkholz <div class="FormattedComment"> Isn't McAfee part of Intel?<br> </div> Sat, 29 Nov 2014 19:42:11 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623287/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623287/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> My thoughts exactly -- at least in its original state.<br> <p> Perhaps it's taking so long because it supports about sixty million different pieces of hardware: &lt;<a href="http://www.comedi.org/hardware.html">http://www.comedi.org/hardware.html</a>&gt;. i.e. this is not "a driver", it's *lots* of drivers, and they were all horrible.<br> </div> Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:36:28 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623229/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623229/ neilbrown <div class="FormattedComment"> A Comedi of errors, perhaps?<br> <p> </div> Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:52:07 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623221/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623221/ nix <div class="FormattedComment"> It seems like it would have been easier to write a new driver. Heck, it seems like it would have been easier to write a new *kernel*.<br> </div> Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:52:34 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623187/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623187/ corbet Send a note to me or to Greg. Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:29:03 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623168/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623168/ Cyberax <div class="FormattedComment"> Looks like it's been close to 4 years by now. I wonder, where can one get a Comedi device for cheap?..<br> </div> Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:45:05 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623164/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623164/ jezuch <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; As is usually the case, H. Hartley Sweeten tops the by-changesets list with the epic task of getting the Comedi drivers into shape in the staging tree.</font><br> <p> That must be some ungodly mess. How long has he been at it?<br> </div> Wed, 26 Nov 2014 07:28:07 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623160/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623160/ mathstuf <div class="FormattedComment"> My kernel patches prompted an email from Greg K-H about my employment once a release was getting close. You could try emailing him about it.<br> </div> Wed, 26 Nov 2014 04:47:17 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623153/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623153/ Magni <div class="FormattedComment"> So totally off topic but how do we change $company associated with $email_address?<br> </div> Wed, 26 Nov 2014 03:45:19 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623146/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623146/ Trelane <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; So it might be safe to say that, for now, the decline in volunteer contributions appears to have leveled out.</font><br> <p> Was the fraction decreasing it the absolute number? The previous sentence discusses fraction, but this, that allegedly builds off of it, is absolute. <br> </div> Tue, 25 Nov 2014 23:35:55 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623141/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623141/ josh <div class="FormattedComment"> If you do end up producing statistics for Mesa, please consider posting those for inclusion in LWN.<br> </div> Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:32:52 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623126/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623126/ Kayden <div class="FormattedComment"> Awesome, thanks!<br> </div> Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:24:51 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623125/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623125/ corbet It's done with gitdm, same thing Greg uses. git://git.lwn.net/gitdm.git Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:21:47 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623124/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623124/ Kayden <div class="FormattedComment"> Out of curiosity, what scripts do you use to produce these statistics? Is it <a href="https://github.com/gregkh/kernel-history/">https://github.com/gregkh/kernel-history/</a> ?<br> <p> I've hacked up a few of my own to produce commit and review statistics for Mesa and Piglit, but I don't yet have any infrastructure for dealing with changes in employment, and the code needs a total overhaul if I'm going to add any more features.<br> </div> Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:20:33 +0000 Some 3.18 development statistics https://lwn.net/Articles/623084/ https://lwn.net/Articles/623084/ wsa <div class="FormattedComment"> "For now, there doesn't appear to be any reason to believe that we will not continue to crank out kernel releases at a high rate indefinitely."<br> <p> Sure, there is. We do not only need code contributors, but also reviewers. The gap is already huge, and as things look it will get even bigger in the future. I know that the problem is discussed here and there and solutions are not known. Still, for starters, I think we shouldn't say that all is perfectly fine at least...<br> </div> Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:08:29 +0000