LWN: Comments on "OpenSSH 6.5 released" https://lwn.net/Articles/583485/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "OpenSSH 6.5 released". en-us Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:13:56 +0000 Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:13:56 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net OpenSSH 6.5 released https://lwn.net/Articles/591542/ https://lwn.net/Articles/591542/ foom <div class="FormattedComment"> Having a tty isn't expected to let you break out of a shell...Although I suppose allowing it presents a bigger attack surface than otherwise.<br> </div> Sat, 22 Mar 2014 22:47:59 +0000 OpenSSH 6.5 released https://lwn.net/Articles/591426/ https://lwn.net/Articles/591426/ jhoblitt <div class="FormattedComment"> I've been waiting for the PermitTTY functionality for years and there have been several tickets begging for this functionality. This is a *big deal* for being able to administratively create role accounts for unpriviledged users that can't break out into a regular shell (yes, you could change the path to the users ssh config dir and play other games but it ends up being rather non-intutive for another admin to figure out what you've done. It was also rather non-orthagonal that some options could only be set in the authorized_keys file).<br> <p> Thank you, Thank you to the OpenSSH devs!<br> </div> Fri, 21 Mar 2014 21:56:52 +0000 OpenSSH 6.5 released https://lwn.net/Articles/583894/ https://lwn.net/Articles/583894/ rsidd <div class="FormattedComment"> +1. And therefore thank you OpenBSD. I have never used it (I think I have used all the other BSDs except BSDi) but I use this OpenBSD product every day.<br> </div> Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:21:00 +0000 SHA256 | base64 https://lwn.net/Articles/583804/ https://lwn.net/Articles/583804/ lambda <p> By the way, my version of the base64 command defaults to encoding, while it looks like the one mentioned above defaults to decoding; and they don't take the same options so you can't write something portable to both (mine doesn't have the <code>-e</code> option). <p> If we're already using the openssl command, we can work around that difference with: <pre> sha256sum () { openssl sha256 -binary "$@" | openssl base64 } </pre> Sat, 01 Feb 2014 17:04:10 +0000 SHA256 | base64 https://lwn.net/Articles/583803/ https://lwn.net/Articles/583803/ lambda You can instead use: <pre> sha256sum () { openssl sha256 -binary "$@" | base64 } </pre> Sat, 01 Feb 2014 16:53:25 +0000 SHA256 | base64 https://lwn.net/Articles/583762/ https://lwn.net/Articles/583762/ aquasync <div class="FormattedComment"> Should be easy enough to interpose an "xxd -r -p" in there.<br> </div> Sat, 01 Feb 2014 05:44:36 +0000 SHA256 | base64 https://lwn.net/Articles/583758/ https://lwn.net/Articles/583758/ ploxiln <div class="FormattedComment"> I see your point, but that won't work because the output of sha256sum is hex, not binary. The best shell-utility-only pipeline would probably involve cutting that hex into pairs with '\x' before each, and then having printf output that. I don't think it would be pretty ;)<br> </div> Sat, 01 Feb 2014 04:18:39 +0000 SHA256 | base64 https://lwn.net/Articles/583732/ https://lwn.net/Articles/583732/ mathstuf <div class="FormattedComment"> Hey, I thought we all preached the UNIX philosophy around here!<br> <p> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; sha256sum () {</font><br> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; /usr/bin/sha256sum "$@" | base64 -e</font><br> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; }</font><br> <p> Isn't that good enough for you? ;)<br> </div> Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:42:19 +0000 SHA256 in base64 https://lwn.net/Articles/583721/ https://lwn.net/Articles/583721/ vonbrand Shouldn't be to hard to hack it in... Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:48:28 +0000 SHA256 in base64 https://lwn.net/Articles/583718/ https://lwn.net/Articles/583718/ proski The SHA256 checksums look funny. It turns out the OpenBSD sha256 utility can output them in base64 encoding, which is nice, as it makes them as short as SHA1 checksums. Perhaps Linux sha256sum could support that mode too. Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:31:13 +0000 OpenSSH 6.5 released https://lwn.net/Articles/583693/ https://lwn.net/Articles/583693/ NightMonkey <div class="FormattedComment"> Thank you, OpenSSH, for just working, and working well, offering both great features and simplicity. :)<br> </div> Fri, 31 Jan 2014 20:38:33 +0000