LWN: Comments on "Overlayfs for 3.10" https://lwn.net/Articles/542707/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Overlayfs for 3.10". en-us Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:57:21 +0000 Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:57:21 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Overlayfs for 3.10 https://lwn.net/Articles/543712/ https://lwn.net/Articles/543712/ heijo <div class="FormattedComment"> Nice, how do we register for the celebrations?<br> </div> Thu, 21 Mar 2013 05:37:56 +0000 Overlayfs for 3.10 https://lwn.net/Articles/543699/ https://lwn.net/Articles/543699/ i3839 <div class="FormattedComment"> I don't know about overlayfs, but considering /etc/ is tiny you could achieve the same result by copying the global components to a local ramdisk/tmpfs and mount-bind the client-specific NFS files/directories one by one with a script. If you don't need local rw, just bind directly on top of the global fs. Or do it the other way round, bind the global fs components on top of the NFS, whatever is more convenient.<br> <p> </div> Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:08:54 +0000 Overlayfs for 3.10 https://lwn.net/Articles/542871/ https://lwn.net/Articles/542871/ giggls <div class="FormattedComment"> One of the typical deployment scenarios for a union type filesystem (actually the one I currently use aufs for) is diskless clients where /etc is made from 2-3 components:<br> global(ro), client-specific(rw via NFS), local (optional, rw on ramdisk)<br> <p> AFAIR this can not be done in overlayfs. So this is going to be worthless for the diskless crowd right?<br> <p> Sven<br> </div> Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:37:24 +0000