LWN: Comments on "3.8 Merge window part 1" https://lwn.net/Articles/528893/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "3.8 Merge window part 1". en-us Fri, 12 Sep 2025 11:38:09 +0000 Fri, 12 Sep 2025 11:38:09 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net 3.8 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/529053/ https://lwn.net/Articles/529053/ BlueLightning <div class="FormattedComment"> Yes, sort of and yes :)<br> <p> I'm the maintainer of the support for Zaurus, iPAQ and other similar era devices (yeah, I know) in OpenEmbedded. After a while if you want to be able to build an up-to-date user space you need to be able to build an up-to-date kernel, and given that we're only now getting to a reasonable level of support in mainline for some of these devices I would hope that we can expect that support to stay there for a reasonable length of time.<br> </div> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:07:27 +0000 All those PXAs look alike https://lwn.net/Articles/529047/ https://lwn.net/Articles/529047/ corbet I don't quite know how I managed that one but yes, it was a mistake. PXA95x is gone, the others remain. Article corrected, apologies for the screwup. Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:33:32 +0000 3.8 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/529046/ https://lwn.net/Articles/529046/ wildea01 <div class="FormattedComment"> Unless I'm mistaken, this must be a mistake. PXA95x has been removed, but 27X and 3XX look alive and well in mainline.<br> </div> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:28:19 +0000 3.8 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/529038/ https://lwn.net/Articles/529038/ nevets <div class="FormattedComment"> Do you actually own any of that hardware? Are you using the last Linux on that hardware?<br> <p> Or are you just missing it because you're nostalgic?<br> </div> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:50:21 +0000 3.8 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/529021/ https://lwn.net/Articles/529021/ BlueLightning <i>Also removed is support for the Intel PXA2xx/PXA3xx architectures on the assumption that nobody will miss it</i> <p>What?! Is there a link to some more information/discussion about this because I'd certainly miss it...</p> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:32:58 +0000 3.8 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/529000/ https://lwn.net/Articles/529000/ mjg59 <div class="FormattedComment"> No, it's been possible to do runtime power management of PCI devices for a long time. The problem with GPUs is the higher layers, not the lower ones.<br> </div> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:49:01 +0000 3.8 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/528996/ https://lwn.net/Articles/528996/ pabs <div class="FormattedComment"> It is mentioned in the article:<br> <p> "support for the venerable 386 architecture has been removed"<br> </div> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:20:56 +0000 3.8 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/528993/ https://lwn.net/Articles/528993/ mathstuf <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt; The devfreq subsystem now supports devices that can be suspended (or placed into an idle state) independently of the rest of the system.</font><br> <p> Does this mean that we'll have better video card power management (especially with dual video card laptops) given some code from their end?<br> </div> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:00:45 +0000 3.8 Merge window part 1 https://lwn.net/Articles/528990/ https://lwn.net/Articles/528990/ yokem_55 <div class="FormattedComment"> It probably came up too late for this article, but some really sadomasochistic folks will be disappointed in the 3.8 kernel as i386 support is no more....<br> </div> Thu, 13 Dec 2012 03:45:17 +0000