LWN: Comments on "A report from the first Korea Linux Forum"

A report from the first Korea Linux Forum

Duncan — Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:20:55 +0000

Tejun Heo's 3.6 kworker work triggered an latent bug in cpu-freq (which was temporarily transferring to a different cpu workers that should have been cpu-locked, while changing freqs) that I happened to hit and report in my testing here during the rcs, so I got a bit of a chance to see his bug tracing and fix implementation at work, even when it ultimately wasn't his problem after all. Fixed in good time for 3.6 release! =:^)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47301

With this article I now have an image to match the name and respect with. =:^)

(Meanwhile, I see I wasn't the only one to be amused by the KLF namespace clash. I feel a bit like a "Justified Ancient of Mumu" myself, referring to it. Meanwhile, "Gangnam Style"'s fun and I definitely appreciate good natured fun at one's own expense, but it could never replace that "Last train to Trancentral" (tho it's a bus in this area), the missing of which can indeed seem pretty "Eternal".)

Duncan

A report from the first Korea Linux Forum

iabervon — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:52:26 +0000

The Gangnam style was presumably necessary to get "3 A.M. Eternal" out of people's heads.

A report from the first Korea Linux Forum

pabs — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:02:12 +0000

Does this mean that Samsung will be working on mainlining support for their devices? This would really help community run distros like Mer, Replicant, SHR, Debian. I would personally like to see support for Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000 devices (since I have one).

A report from the first Korea Linux Forum

ksoonson — Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:52:52 +0000

Hi Jon it was very nice to have you and other key developers here in Korea. It was a truly inspiring moment for many people and we wish the KLF continues.