LWN: Comments on "Uprobes: 11th time is the charm?" https://lwn.net/Articles/433568/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Uprobes: 11th time is the charm?". en-us Sat, 06 Sep 2025 17:00:58 +0000 Sat, 06 Sep 2025 17:00:58 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Uprobes: 11th time is the charm? https://lwn.net/Articles/435241/ https://lwn.net/Articles/435241/ fuhchee <div class="FormattedComment"> A future gdb interface for this functionality would not require nor give you any new privileges. Probes would be naturally restricted to your processes. No actual writing to the disk files is done.<br> <p> Systemtap has the same properties w.r.t. the older utrace/uprobes it carries: a root user can operate systemwide, and an unprivileged user can operate upon her own processes.<br> <p> </div> Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:41:53 +0000 Uprobes: 11th time is the charm? https://lwn.net/Articles/435132/ https://lwn.net/Articles/435132/ kevinm <div class="FormattedComment"> So, if I want to put a probe in libc.so, it ends up being executed by every process on the system?<br> <p> Presumably I would have to have write permissions to libc to do so - so if gdb was to use this, I wouldn't be able to set breakpoints on library functions unless I'm root? That sounds like a nonstarter to me.<br> </div> Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:06:42 +0000