LWN: Comments on "Openmoko Community Update" https://lwn.net/Articles/425859/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Openmoko Community Update". en-us Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:39:06 +0000 Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:39:06 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Openmoko Community Update https://lwn.net/Articles/425984/ https://lwn.net/Articles/425984/ ssam <div class="FormattedComment"> there is a draft reference manual attached to<br> <a href="http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/gta04-owner/2011-January/000000.html">http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/gta04-owner/2011-Jan...</a><br> if you want more hardware details.<br> </div> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:16:28 +0000 Gta02-core also dead https://lwn.net/Articles/425916/ https://lwn.net/Articles/425916/ dcbw <div class="FormattedComment"> The baseband is apparently an Option-rebranded Qualcomm Gobi device. Which sucks, since Qualcomm is about the most unfriendly when it comes to open-source, especially in the baseband division.<br> <p> While I'm not sure what changes Option has been allowed to make to the Gobi firmware (an Option engineer told me they can't make many) the Gobi devices expose only one AT port, a GPS port (that can't be used for AT commands), a DIAG port, and a QMI port.<br> <p> The DIAG and QMI protocols are proprietary and only partially reverse-engineered. QMI requires a proprietary, closed userspace helper library for things as simple as SMS and getting the current access technology (ie GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSPA, etc).<br> <p> So going with a Gobi (even if it's coming from Option) is a strange choice for a project that built it's reputation on openness. Especially if the modules don't support a full suite of AT commands on multiple ports, which the Gobi parts don't with normal Qualcomm firmware.<br> </div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:15:23 +0000 Gta02-core also dead https://lwn.net/Articles/425907/ https://lwn.net/Articles/425907/ coriordan <div class="FormattedComment"> Might there be a free GSM stack for it when Harald Welte's project is ready?<br> <p> <a href="http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2010/08/14/">http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2010/08/14/</a><br> <a href="http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/2010-August/000567.html">http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/2010-Au...</a><br> </div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:47:21 +0000 Gta02-core also dead https://lwn.net/Articles/425904/ https://lwn.net/Articles/425904/ neilbrown <div class="FormattedComment"> I *think* the only closed bit is the OpenVR 3D video which needs a closed module for X (I *think* the kernel side is open).<br> <p> And of course the firmware inside the GSM/3G device etc are closed.<br> <p> But everything else seems to be open.<br> </div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:31:28 +0000 Gta02-core also dead https://lwn.net/Articles/425896/ https://lwn.net/Articles/425896/ alvieboy <div class="FormattedComment"> Unfortunately, our own gta02-core project (a full open-source design based on GTA02) is also a bit dead lately. GTA04 is also facing a fierce competition on mobile devices, one that makes it ultimately difficult to live to tell your story.<br> <p> I don't know the device, but I suspect again it won't be fully open-source (as gta02-core aimed to). Can anyone confirm ?<br> <p> Alvaro<br> </div> Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:28:50 +0000