LWN: Comments on "Web tracking and "Do Not Track"" https://lwn.net/Articles/424861/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Web tracking and "Do Not Track"". en-us Mon, 20 Oct 2025 04:43:12 +0000 Mon, 20 Oct 2025 04:43:12 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Web tracking and "Do Not Track" https://lwn.net/Articles/426519/ https://lwn.net/Articles/426519/ muwlgr <div class="FormattedComment"> To my mind, this looks just too similar to RFC 3514 ("Evil bit"), and is going to be implemented and supported equally well :&gt;<br> </div> Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:09:00 +0000 Selectively enable cookies https://lwn.net/Articles/426494/ https://lwn.net/Articles/426494/ idupree <div class="FormattedComment"> Tracking often uses a lot more data than cookies. For example see <a rel="nofollow" href="https://panopticlick.eff.org/">https://panopticlick.eff.org/</a> . User-Agent, preferred this or that, IP address, etc... even without cookies, sites can have a pretty good guess at keeping a timeline about you.<br> </div> Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:14:56 +0000 MSIE block lists https://lwn.net/Articles/425678/ https://lwn.net/Articles/425678/ dmarti This looks like a promising approach for handling blocking lists within the browser: <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/12/07/ie9-and-privacy-introducing-tracking-protection-v8.aspx">IE9 and Privacy: Introducing Tracking Protection</a>. Would be interesting to see extensions for the Free browsers that support the same lists. Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:35:46 +0000 Web tracking and "Do Not Track" https://lwn.net/Articles/425591/ https://lwn.net/Articles/425591/ job <div class="FormattedComment"> What incentives could the advertisement networks possibly have to honour these opt-out systems?<br> <p> Wouldn't a client implementation, where the browser simply ignores setting these cookies, be a more robust solution? I believe all the common browsers today offer "private surfing" modes that work this way.<br> </div> Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:34:46 +0000 "Do Not Track" https://lwn.net/Articles/425214/ https://lwn.net/Articles/425214/ smadu2 <div class="FormattedComment"> <a href="http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.txt">http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.txt</a> . They seem to maintain a huge list of all websites which are either ads, disregard privacy, etc ... and can be cat'ed to /etc/hosts file.<br> </div> Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:24:16 +0000 "Do Not Track" https://lwn.net/Articles/425152/ https://lwn.net/Articles/425152/ ballombe <div class="FormattedComment"> This is an extract from my /etc/hosts:<br> 0.0.0.0 quadzero<br> 0.0.0.0 a.tribalfusion.com<br> 0.0.0.0 www.google-analytics.com<br> 0.0.0.0 pagead2.googlesyndication.com<br> 0.0.0.0 ad.doubleclick.net<br> (etc.)<br> <p> This is not perfect, but it sure beat maintaining opt-out cookies.<br> It has the added benefit of not slowing down browsing when one of those service is down.<br> </div> Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:06:15 +0000 Selectively enable cookies https://lwn.net/Articles/424985/ https://lwn.net/Articles/424985/ felixfix <div class="FormattedComment"> I disable cookies, then selectively enable them (in Firefox preferences) for sites that I choose. Sometimes it's a nuisance; citi credit cards jumps to a completely different site (cardonline.com or some such) after you log in, so the first time you do it, you just grit your teeth and cuss 'em out under your breath. Most I only allow to have session cookies.<br> <p> If this tracking is something different, please let me know.<br> </div> Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:34:55 +0000