LWN: Comments on "KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee" https://lwn.net/Articles/420622/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee". en-us Sun, 14 Sep 2025 19:22:58 +0000 Sun, 14 Sep 2025 19:22:58 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee https://lwn.net/Articles/420747/ https://lwn.net/Articles/420747/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> FWIW, RHEL 6 is shipping with upstart and Red Hat hasn't pushed for it to be included afaik. Probably not a concern as much as other key packages to bump into patent issues. I would be interested to know if that listing has ever been updated.<br> </div> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:26:26 +0000 KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee https://lwn.net/Articles/420746/ https://lwn.net/Articles/420746/ sebas <div class="FormattedComment"> KDE e.V. joining the OIN has actually been discussed and decided during Akademy in Tampere, last summer. It's most definitely not a consequence of Novell selling a patent package. It might be useful in that light, at some point, though I hope we'll never have to invoke the OIN.<br> </div> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:17:58 +0000 KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee https://lwn.net/Articles/420742/ https://lwn.net/Articles/420742/ tzafrir <div class="FormattedComment"> Here's something better:<br> <p> the OIN site lists a set of software packages as defining the Linux system:<br> <a href="http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/pat_linuxdefpop.html">http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/pat_linuxdefpop.html</a><br> <p> Will it ever be updating to include e.g. upstart and systemd? Or would it be safer to stick with the legacy sysvinit?<br> </div> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:53:36 +0000 KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee https://lwn.net/Articles/420743/ https://lwn.net/Articles/420743/ gidoca <div class="FormattedComment"> Are these Novell patents that important that everyone joins right now? First Gentoo, then The Document Foundation, now KDE...<br> </div> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:51:43 +0000 KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee https://lwn.net/Articles/420737/ https://lwn.net/Articles/420737/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> Isn't that obviously a silly joke? I am sure we can invest time in better things than that. <br> </div> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:16:10 +0000 KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee https://lwn.net/Articles/420733/ https://lwn.net/Articles/420733/ pabs <div class="FormattedComment"> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=software+in+the+public+interest+open+invention+network">http://www.google.com/search?q=software+in+the+public+int...</a><br> -&gt; <a href="http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/topic/6603/invitation-to-open-invention-network/">http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/topic/6603/invitation-t...</a><br> -&gt; <a href="http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/post/56599/#p56599">http://crunchbanglinux.org/forums/post/56599/#p56599</a><br> -&gt; <a href="http://ompldr.org/vM25yNw">http://ompldr.org/vM25yNw</a><br> </div> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:01:17 +0000 KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee https://lwn.net/Articles/420726/ https://lwn.net/Articles/420726/ skvidal <div class="FormattedComment"> where did you get that fine-print from?<br> <p> </div> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 05:43:29 +0000 KDE Joins Open Invention Network as a Licensee https://lwn.net/Articles/420703/ https://lwn.net/Articles/420703/ pabs <div class="FormattedComment"> Hmm, I wonder if they read the fine print:<br> <p> <a href="http://ompldr.org/vM25yNw">http://ompldr.org/vM25yNw</a><br> </div> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:23:21 +0000