LWN: Comments on "Liberté Linux 2010.1" https://lwn.net/Articles/416565/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Liberté Linux 2010.1". en-us Sun, 07 Sep 2025 14:36:57 +0000 Sun, 07 Sep 2025 14:36:57 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Liberté Linux 2010.1 https://lwn.net/Articles/416784/ https://lwn.net/Articles/416784/ loevborg <div class="FormattedComment"> Thanks for the additional comments.<br> </div> Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:17:50 +0000 Liberté Linux 2010.1 https://lwn.net/Articles/416636/ https://lwn.net/Articles/416636/ liberte <div class="FormattedComment"> The first release of Liberté (2010.0, this one is actually the second release) used GRUB Legacy, and correct installation was a nightmare from the maintenance point of view. You can see for yourself here:<br> <a rel="nofollow" href="https://liberte.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/liberte/tags/liberte-2010.0/burn-usb">https://liberte.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/liberte/tags/...</a><br> <p> Liberté had to be installed on a separate partition, which had to be the second one (Windows sees only the first partition on removable disks). I don't think that there is a relatively easy way to accomplish such an installation from Windows.<br> <p> Syslinux, on the other hand, allows the distribution to be a simple directory on FAT/FAT32-formatted disk, and provides installers for both Linux and Windows — the installer just modifies the boot sector to load ldlinux.sys, and possibly also modifies the MBR if the installation is to a partition.<br> <p> I think that UNetbootin (which I understand is essentially a wrapper around ISOs) is an unnecessary layer that complicates things.<br> <p> By the way, I think that for LiveCDs (as opposed to LiveUSBs), GRUB and Syslinux are equally simple to install and to use, but I only tried GRUB — LiveCD support was removed from Liberté Linux before the transition to Syslinux.<br> </div> Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:38:00 +0000 Liberté Linux 2010.1 https://lwn.net/Articles/416576/ https://lwn.net/Articles/416576/ loevborg From the installation instructions: <blockquote> <p>1. Download liberte-201X.Y.zip from the SourceForge project site.</p> <p>2. Extract the archive into the root folder of the media you want to use.</p> <p>To make the media bootable:</p> <p>3. (Windows) In liberte folder, launch setup.bat. You probably need to right-click and select Run as administrator in Vista and in Windows 7 — read the console messages. (Linux) Copy liberte/setup.sh to a local directory, and run setup.sh /dev/XXX as root — providing the (unmounted) media to which you extracted the archive as the argument. Syslinux (and GNU Parted if /dev/XXX is a partition) must be installed.</p> </blockquote> I wish Ubuntu would put its live media contents into a single folder as well, on a CD as well as on a USB stick. That makes it less scary than an arcane assortment of SYSLINUX.XYZ and CASPAR directory entries. Also supplying a setup.sh is sensible. We could even introduce a cross-distro convention how the layout of a Linux live USB stick should look like. Much better than the current state of affairs, which amounts to semin-reliable unetbootin, usb-creator and friends. The layout might be: <pre> /ubuntu-10.04-live/live.ini /ubuntu-10.04-live/linux /ubuntu-10.04-live/initrd /ubuntu-10.04-live/data /fedora-14-live/live.ini ... </pre> On boot, SYSLINUX or GRUB, which is installed with a single click by some program like usb-creator, would present the user with a choice of which directory (containing a live.ini) to base the boot on. Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:59:21 +0000