LWN: Comments on "IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work" https://lwn.net/Articles/409579/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work". en-us Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:26:53 +0000 Thu, 23 Oct 2025 13:26:53 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/410348/ https://lwn.net/Articles/410348/ nix <blockquote> as far as i am concerned, everything oracle has acquired, specifically mysql and java, are radioactive </blockquote> Replacing Berkeley DB might be annoying as well. Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:50:25 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/410037/ https://lwn.net/Articles/410037/ daniel <i>I think you underestimate the strength, vitality, and popularity of Java as a Linux enterprise development environment.</i> <br><br> Java is popular all right, mainly because it's pretty hard to segfault and it doesn't leak memory. But it's unpopular with me because it's slow and bloaty, for both development and finished applications. Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:14:40 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409869/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409869/ b7j0c <div class="FormattedComment"> yes cool matters, you'd be naive to think programming languages aren't at least partially driven by fashion<br> <p> the whims of taste will dictate who uses what tools and who you can expect to work with and what types of projects and what type of culture<br> <p> you're in good luck, the cool kids like python. go work with them, they have free m&amp;m's in their snack rooms<br> <p> the java crowd will be relegated to offices where they put white powder in their food-service coffee<br> <p> <p> </div> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:19:23 +0000 Will this make Free Java usable? https://lwn.net/Articles/409756/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409756/ yodermk <div class="FormattedComment"> Every time I've tried to run a substantial application on an open source Java implementation, it's always failed, usually with subtle but serious problems.<br> <p> For that and other reasons, I've pretty much given up on Java for my development, focusing now on Python and C++ with Qt.<br> </div> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:34:26 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409742/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409742/ raven667 <div class="FormattedComment"> "java will truly become the new cobol"<br> <p> Is how "cool" the language is or it's style more important than it's function for you? I happen to prefer python at the moment but I an recognize than java has an experienced and vibrant community, massive collection of reusable code libraries and is used to successfully solve a lot of problems. I suppose it's popularity in business makes it like COBOL but you say that like it's a bad thing. <br> </div> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:38:52 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409729/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409729/ b7j0c <div class="FormattedComment"> oh i'm well aware that java isn't "going away"...but it will become irrelevant. it will move steadfastly into the cabal of technologies reserved solely for outsourcing and maintenance. the cool kids were already moving away from it, and this will just finish that trend...java will truly become the new cobol<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:08:50 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409673/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409673/ Ed_L. I think you underestimate the strength, vitality, and popularity of Java as a Linux enterprise development environment. It ain't going away. IBM is trying to make Java stronger by working with Oracle America's Java dev team rather than at odds. There does remain the issue with the certification code license; we'll see. Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:38:31 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409670/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409670/ b7j0c <div class="FormattedComment"> goodbye java. finally all of the "practical" coders who derided the idealism of open-source advocates are discovering that the worst-case scenario sometimes emerges<br> <p> as far as i am concerned, everything oracle has acquired, specifically mysql and java, are radioactive<br> <p> clojure and scala folks probably want to start investigating alternate backends or share java's slide into irrelevance<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:13:43 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409669/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409669/ b7j0c <div class="FormattedComment"> they've made it pretty clear that they are out of harmony<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:08:43 +0000 IcedTea https://lwn.net/Articles/409607/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409607/ mjw <div class="FormattedComment"> There is indeed a close working relationship between IcedTea and OpenJDK. And IcedTea has always promoted itself as not being an actual fork of OpenJDK, just a way for hackers to work together without any legal/political/technical constraints.<br> <p> <a href="http://icedtea.classpath.org/">http://icedtea.classpath.org/</a> closely tracks OpenJDK, makes sure the code base can be bootstrapped with a free toolchain (GCC/GCJ/GNU Classpath), has a framework to make it possible for people to package things in GNU/Linux distributions, plugs some small holes in OpenJDK, so one can be sure to not need any proprietary blobs still left in OpenJDK/ClosedJDK, integrates with other free software projects like Cacao, VisualVM, Rhino, etc. Is a testing ground of portability of HotSpot through Zero and Shark. And adds missing pieces like Java Web Start (JNLP) and a browser plugin (Applet) support. For those that wish to sign the SCA code is contributed to OpenJDK (if existing code licenses allow assigning all rights to Oracle of course).<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:49:52 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409605/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409605/ job <div class="FormattedComment"> It would not surprise me if IBM had multiple simultaneous strategies with Java. IBM had a licensed fork of JRE back when it was proprietary. They probably have both internal and external obligations to support.<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:33:49 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409602/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409602/ nim-nim <div class="FormattedComment"> I don't think there is a lot of disconnect between IcedTea and OpenJDK those days. OpenJDK is slowly integrating IcedTea changes, and IcedTea is quickly rebased over new OpenJDK releases when they happen (hell, even Red Hat does not call its java package icedtea anymore, it's openjdk now, even though it's actually an icedtea-ed openjdk).<br> <p> The big news here is that IBM is dropping Harmony as its open-source Java target and switching to OpenJDK. In SUN times, IBM had resisted supporting OpenJDK, backing Harmony, and trying this way to force an OpenJDK licence change away from copyleft-ish GPLish licensing. I guess they've realised Oracle was too strong to get its hand forced this way, and that they could live with GPL+CE.<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:40:09 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409599/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409599/ bojan <div class="FormattedComment"> According to this: <a href="http://www.sutor.com/c/2010/10/ibm-joins-the-openjdk-community/">http://www.sutor.com/c/2010/10/ibm-joins-the-openjdk-comm...</a>, they'll be going away form Harmony.<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:52:25 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409595/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409595/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> IBM is a big contributor to Apache Harmony<br> <p> <a href="http://harmony.apache.org/contributors.html">http://harmony.apache.org/contributors.html</a><br> <p> It remains to be seen whether they are now abandoning that effort in favour of OpenJDK or merely hedging their bets. Being a big organization, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of different divisions doing different things. <br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:42:08 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409594/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409594/ tajyrink <div class="FormattedComment"> Sure, of course that would be the natural project. So far though there is no new (post-Oracle) industry support for IcedTea. The alternative would indeed have been that IBM would have joined IcedTea together with friends, but Oracle seems to have now learned to fight to keep their last free software project within themselves.<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:19:10 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409588/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409588/ rahulsundaram <div class="FormattedComment"> There is already IcedTea from Red Hat<br> <p> <a href="http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page">http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page</a><br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 04:37:25 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409587/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409587/ tajyrink <div class="FormattedComment"> So after MySQL -&gt; MariaDB, OpenSolaris -&gt; IllumOS and OpenOffice.org -&gt; LibreOffice, they decided that maybe they could try to keep this Java thing from becoming Classpath (or something)? Of course, it was the most important thing for them anyway.<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 04:35:41 +0000 IBM joins Oracle for OpenJDK work https://lwn.net/Articles/409586/ https://lwn.net/Articles/409586/ realnc <div class="FormattedComment"> "And then we can sue the hell out of everyone who uses Java because it's so open."<br> </div> Tue, 12 Oct 2010 04:28:22 +0000